[Clips] The myth of "suitcase nukes."

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:24:09 -0500 To: Philodox Clips List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Clips] The myth of "suitcase nukes." Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Clips] Security 2.0: FBI Tries Again To Upgrade Technology

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:29:37 -0500 To: Philodox Clips List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Clips] Security 2.0: FBI Tries Again To Upgrade Technology Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EM

[Clips] How Tools of War On Terror Ensnare Wanted Citizens

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:35:05 -0500 To: Philodox Clips List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Clips] How Tools of War On Terror Ensnare Wanted Citizens Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMA

Re: packet traffic analysis

In the context of: >>If your plaintext consists primarily of small packets, you should set the MTU >>of the transporter to be small. This will cause fragmentation of the >>large packets, which is the price you have to pay. Conversely, if your >>plaintext consists primarily of large packets, yo

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Skype security evaluation]

A similar approach enabled Bleichenbacher's SSL attack on RSA with PKCS#1 padding. This sounds very dangerous to me. William > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cyphrpunk > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 5:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Passport Hell (was [Clips] Re: [duodenalswitch] Re: Konstantin)

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:55:05 -0500 To: "Philodox Clips List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Clips] Re: [duodenalswitch] Re: Konstantin Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Study and Results of (H.)-(G.)-(H.)

Thanks for Enquiring about our recent (H.)uman-(G.)rowth-(H.)ormone Study. Dr. Wright and Hormone Specialist Elizabeth Hall have finally completed their 2 year study on the (H.)-(G.)-(H.) product at the Life Tran-sitions Institution. These are summary results (20 male, 20 female patients) %IMP

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Skype security evaluation]

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von cyphrpunk > Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 06:07 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cryptography@metzdowd.com > Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Skype security evaluation] > > Wasn't there a rumor la

Re: On the orthogonality of anonymity to current market demand

hi ( 05.10.26 09:17 -0700 ) James A. Donald: > While many people are rightly concerned that DRM will > ultimately mean that the big corporation, and thus the > state, has root access to their computers and the owner > does not, it also means that trojans, viruses, and > malware does not. do you r

Re: On the orthogonality of anonymity to current market demand

At 10:22 AM -0500 10/31/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >and doesn't history show that big corporations are only interested in >revenue One should hope so. ;-) Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Street,

Re: Multiple passports?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Gutmann wrote: > Gregory Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>As for applying for one now, I think the deadline for the non-RFID passwords >>is about 3 days away (31 Oct 2005), but I could be wrong. (In other words, if >>your application is

Re: On the orthogonality of anonymity to current market demand

James A. Donald writes: > Further, genuinely secure systems are now becoming available, notably > Symbian. What does it mean for Symbian to be genuinely secure? How was this determined and achieved? -- http://www.eff.org/about/staff/#chris_palmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: On the orthogonality of anonymity to current market demand

James A. Donald writes: > > Further, genuinely secure systems are now becoming available, notably > > Symbian. Chris Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What does it mean for Symbian to be genuinely secure? How was this > determined and achieved? There is no official definition of "genuinely secure", an

Re: packet traffic analysis

> I very much doubt it. Where did that factor of "half" come frome. During lulls, you are constantly sending chaff packets. On average, you're halfway through transmitting a chaff packet when you want to send a real one. The system has to wait for it to finish before sending another. QED. > A

Re: packet traffic analysis

> Modes that are based on a small window of previous plaintext, such as > OFB, would be vulnerable too. My mistake, OFB does not have this property. I thought there was a common mode with this property, but it appears that I am mistaken. If it makes you feel any better, you can consider the PRNG

Please confirm your request to join hersey-serbest

Hello cypherpunks@minder.net, We have received your request to join the hersey-serbest group hosted by Yahoo! Groups, a free, easy-to-use community service. This request will expire in 7 days. TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE GROUP: 1) Go to the Yahoo! Groups site by clicking on this link: http

[Clips] Christopher Hitchens: What Goes Around Comes Around

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:48:56 -0500 To: Philodox Clips List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Clips] Christopher Hitchens: What Goes Around Comes Around Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EM