On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Naturally you'd have to trust that at least one remailer was honest --
> but you already do that, right?
Just a curiosity note (yes, I *should* RTFM, but it's about 6am, and I'm
late for work, not to mention lazy today :-)
While one remailer is cons
We are Loan Specialists
Free Service to
Homeowners!
Home Loans Available For Any Situation.
http://www1.u1.pp.ru/user534/mortg/MO_mort_illustration.jpg";
width="175" height="70">
Whether
your credit rating is A++ or you are "credit challenged",
we have many loan programs through hundreds of
On 9 Aug 2001, Dr. Evil wrote:
>I have a question for you c'punks. If you wanted to generate some bitmaps
>of text which would be difficult or impossible to OCR, but not too
>difficult for humans to read, how would you do that? Basically, I want to
>create GIFs of text which can't be OCRed in a
Where's the source, Faustine? Why would anyone concerned about
personal security want to use something like this? For all anybody
knows, this was put together by some of your friends in NSA to
lull the sheeple with fake security audits -- or maybe it finds
key loggers, just not the ones the fe
> It depends a lot on your threat model. If the people who want a copy
> are determined enough, they'll just retype it :-)
Which is exactly what I want! Basically, I need to create a web page
which is "humans only beyond this point". One task that humans can do
easily and reliably is read mess
