Ray Dillinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, David Honig wrote:
>
> >At 08:17 AM 1/8/01 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>and there are very few opportunities for real misunderstanding. We know
> >
> >The meaning of 'billion' differs by three orders of magnitude
> >across the pond.
David Honig wrote:
>
> >>and there are very few opportunities for real misunderstanding.
>
> So Ken if you read that Blair was near Thatcher's house and knocked
> her up, Yanks would think something very different from Brits.
You've been listening to those old Max Miller records again, haven't
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_6924_02A2.65DA"
Hi,
It is free to sign up!
YOU PAY ONLY WHEN YOU ARE ASSURED TO RECEIVE THE
PHASE 3 PAYOUT OF $800.
and then it costs you a low one time out-of-pocket
investment of $75 USD.
Q: Is this opportunity too good to be true?
A: The way that we have structured the compensation plan, we know that
it is
At 03:05 AM 1/9/01 -0500, petro wrote:
> The main difference being that the Church Goers *think* that
>what they are doing is legal, while the pot smokers (for the most
>part) know that what they are doing is either illegal, or legally
>questionable.
Depends which church you subscribe to. Rastaf
At 11:45 AM 1/9/01 +, Ken Brown wrote:
>David Honig wrote:
>>
>> >>and there are very few opportunities for real misunderstanding.
>>
>> So Ken if you read that Blair was near Thatcher's house and knocked
>> her up, Yanks would think something very different from Brits.
>
>You've been listen
With all the hoopla over the release of the final version of the Linux
2.4.0 kernel last week, Microsoft Corp.'s delivery of an interim beta
version of its Windows 2000 successor, code-named Whistler, got lost in
the shuffle.
But according to Whistler testers, Microsoft issued build 2410 of its
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Blank Frank wrote:
> But according to Whistler testers, Microsoft issued build 2410 of its
>next version of Windows on Thursday. New in this build are many
>user-interface tweaks, as well as the incorporation of new anti-piracy
>code.
>...
>No more casual copying?
>The most
At 5:23 PM -0500 1/9/01, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>But if Microsoft and its ilk do in fact successfully create systems
>that prevent "piracy", it won't be possible to be a hypocrite about
>it any more. And with commercial software flatly refusing some
>kinds of use, perhaps a fair number of people wh
* Ray Dillinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010108 21:40]:
[..]
> ... This monumental stupidity was a feature
> of the circus of fools around me for many years, and is still
> where my mind goes by reflex action whenever I hear about electricity
> supply difficulties, power costs and escalating hom
Dear Friend,
Remember the first time you built a web site?
You spent weeks, perhaps months on it. It was your
masterpiece.
You showed it to all of your family and friends and everyone
loved it.
THE WORLD WAS GOOD!
Then you ran out of people to show it to. It was time to start the
Internet M
UNIVERSITY DIPLOMAS
Obtain a prosperous future, money earning power,
and the admiration of all.
Diplomas from prestigious non-accredited
universities based on your present knowledge
and life experience.
No required tests, classes, books, or interviews.
Bachelors, masters, MBA, and doctorate (P
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 12:22:26AM -0500, An Metet wrote:
> by Joel Enos
> January 08, 2001
> Ê
> At last, a book about secret codes that isn't boring or too technical!
And a book review that isn't accurate...
> In the end, you get a history lesson and a new set of questions to
ponder (such as
>>No more casual copying?
>>The most potentially controversial addition to Whistler 2410, however,
>>is anti-piracy code that Microsoft is calling "Microsoft Product
>>Activation for Windows,"
Copy protection is annoying when you have only one machine.
It's much more annoying in the commercially
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Bill Stewart wrote:
> The El Cheapo PCs each came with a licensed Win98;
> I've got the disks in a stack, and keeping track of which
> CD goes with which PC would be a serious annoyance.
> It's actually worse, because the PCs are pieces of junk
> that need to be have major c
16 matches
Mail list logo
