Title: Executive Guild Membership
ApplicationResponse-O-Matic Form
Dear Professional,
You have been selected as a potential candidate for a free
listing in the 2000 - 2001 Edition of the International Executive
Guild Registry.
Please accept our congratulations for this coveted hono
Title: Executive Guild Membership
ApplicationResponse-O-Matic Form
Dear Professional,
You have been selected as a potential candidate for a free
listing in the 2000 - 2001 Edition of the International Executive
Guild Registry.
Please accept our congratulations for this coveted hono
There is an Observer artical at:
http://www.observer.co.uk//uk_news/story/0,6903,406191,00.html
The leaked report refered to is at: http://cryptome.org/ncis-carnivore.htm
Choate: There's no need to post the whole thing to the list now.
AGL
--
In an orderly world, there's always a place for t
At 2:27 PM -0500 12/3/00, Adam Langley wrote:
>Attachment converted: G4 Tower HD:UK Govt seeks to capture and st
>(MiME/CSOm) (F86A)
This is really getting out of hand! Attempting to open this message,
by clicking on the attachment, bombs/crashes my Eudora Pro 5.0.1
mailer. Repeatedly--I
/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
A SPECIAL OFFER FOR YOU TO INCREASE YOUR SALES!
How To Reach Thousands Of Prospects
Every Month Virtually Free!
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
Our research has found that many people h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If messages are signed, great care should be taken to ensure that the
> signatures do not in any way interfere with the normal presentation
> of good old ASCII text, the lingua franca of the online world.
The pr
At 7:16 PM -0500 12/3/00, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If messages are signed, great care should be taken to ensure that the
>> signatures do not in any way interfere with the normal presentation
>> of good old ASC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is pointless for me to argue that you folks should stick to ASCII.
I agree that people should stick to ASCII, which is why my messages
are completely made up of plain ASCII text. I use the content-type
fields
Both of you make reasonable points. (I read cypherpunks exclusively with
mutt, which does follow the standards, perhaps even fanatically.)
But there seems to be little benefit to (a) signing messages, though
this admittedly a personal issue and (b) using MIME types when some
mailreaders will not
