On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann wrote:
>> One variation of the original proposal would be to only allow egress to
>> addresses known to lay in a jurisdiction different from the one in which the
>> remailer resides. I know, the problem is nontrivial with all the dotcom
>> addresses and s
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Bill Stewart wrote:
>>One variation of the original proposal would be to only allow egress to
>>addresses known to lay in a jurisdiction different from the one in which the
>>remailer resides. I know, the problem is nontrivial with all the dotcom
>>addresses and such around. D
>On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>
>
>>I'm currently thinking of whether or not it is feasable to put stego
>>data into EVERY .mp3 downloaded. just put random data into those not
>>intended to carry a message.
>
>For the sake of us audiophiles, please don't. MP3 is tinny and flat
>at best; it
>At 10:52 AM 10/6/00 -0400, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>For the sake of us audiophiles, please don't. MP3 is tinny and flat
>>at best;
>
>Then why are you 'audiophiles' traumatizing yourselves by listening
>to it?
>
> it ticks me off that most folks seem to hear it as "good
>>enough", because if most
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>> Lossy compression.
>>
>> balance snipped, we need lossless compression, eh?
>
>nope we don't. remember that everyone said that .jpeg couldn't be used
>for stego for that same reason? then the first .jpeg-stego tools
>arrived.
The only problem with lossy co
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 18:01:33 -0700
From: Somebody
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: http://www.rfdata.net/ATM-POS/
will wonders never cease? wanna put an atm machine at an Anguillan
hot-spot?
really. why do you think they're registered in the BVI? Wireless ATM
machi
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to cbone.ml.cypherpunks as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Choate) writes:
> What happened to the new node that was supposed to go online at the last
> meeting?
>
> Cold feet?
No, just a cold staying in bed for a week.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to cbone.ml.cypherpunks as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Choate) writes:
> What happened to the new node that was supposed to go online at the las=
t
> meeting?
>=20
> Cold feet?
No, just a cold staying in bed for a week
ÏÐÎÔÅÑÑÈß - ÏÑÈÕÎËÎÃ
ÂÒÎÐÎÅ ÂÛÑØÅÅ ÂÅ×ÅÐÍÅÅ ÎÁÐÀÇÎÂÀÍÈÅ ÏÎ ÏÑÈÕÎËÎÃÈÈ
ÇÀ 3 ÃÎÄÀ!
ØÊÎËÀ ÏÑÈÕÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÌÀÑÒÅÐÑÒÂÀ
ÐÎÑÑÈÉÑÊÎÃÎ ÓÍÈÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒÀ ÄÐÓÆÁÛ ÍÀÐÎÄÎÂ
îáúÿâëÿåò î÷åðåäíîé îñåííèé íàáîð ëèö ñ âûñøèì îáðàçîâàíèåì íà
ñïå
The stock GOLX has penetrated the Telecommunications and Internet market of India. This newly trading Company is the world's first digital conglomerate with its high-speed broadband network, its the most comprehensive set of services available on the Internet today. Find out why Global Cro
Some time ago, the president of Somalia returned from his exile to
Mogadishu, the former capital of Somalia, which was going to be the new
capital of Somalia. Lots of people gave lots of speeches about how popular
and successful the new government was, and CNN gave a glowing account of
how pl
--
At 03:39 PM 06/10/00 -1000, Reese wrote:
James A.. Donald wrote:
> > Distortions at Fourth Hand
> > Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman
> >The Nation, June 25, 1977
> >
> >: : such journals as the Far Eastern Economic Review , the
> >: : London Economist , the Melbourne
>>On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm currently thinking of whether or not it is feasable to put stego
>>>data into EVERY .mp3 downloaded. just put random data into those not
>>>intended to carry a message.
>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>You're talking
>>about makin
--
At 07:56 PM 10/6/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> It
> dissects whines such as yours and sends them to the oven, where they can
> be properly roasted with flesh-searing heat, the better to reduce the
> fatty content.
I have often remarked on how Chomsky's board treats inconvenient facts and
Hi everybody;
I have no interest in Chomsky flames and wish they would die.
In fact, I'm going to *MAKE* them die, for me at least, by
filtering posts on chomsky's name. (yes, this post right here
is going into the bitbucket when it gets back to me from the
list).
I'm just dropping this
If you are someone who is driven, motivated, and
serious about earning a Multiple Six Figure Income,
we would like to speak with you. If you have reached the
point in your life where you are ready for Financial Freedom
and a Real Opportunity to Retire in 2-4 years,
calling the number below is your
Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
> Hi everybody;
>
> I have no interest in Chomsky flames and wish they would die.
> In fact, I'm going to *MAKE* them die, for me at least, by
> filtering posts on chomsky's name. (yes, this post right here
> is going into the bitbucket when it gets back to me from the
>
Well, they are original. I do not recall any other instance when
a government said "we will not snoop."
---
"Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic has no longer any
influence on the police and army force in the country, and all phone
taps, both fixed and mobile in Serbia have stopped, sta
At 1:42 PM -0400 10/7/00, Steve Furlong wrote:
>Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody;
>>
>> I have no interest in Chomsky flames and wish they would die.
>> In fact, I'm going to *MAKE* them die, for me at least, by
>> filtering posts on chomsky's name. (yes, this post right here
>> is go
Hello,
You are receiving this because someone has requested to register the
email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] with eGroups, a free email group
service. To complete your registration, we need to verify that your
email address is valid and that you do wish to register with our
service.
To continue
At 07:08 PM 10/6/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
> Your anonymizer.com is blocked in Saudi Arabia via proxy. Can you tell me a
> way I can see this site
DEFECT and move to a country that allows access to the server!
At 07:24 PM 07/10/00 -0400, James A.. Donald wrote:
>At 02:12 PM 10/7/2000 -0400, Tim May wrote:
> > As for Chomsky, I've been deleting all of the recent posts arguing
> > pro- or con-Chomsky.
>
>You did not miss much.
>
>In the most recent Chomsky thread, all the same things were said, as
Hello,
You are receiving this because someone has requested to register the
email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] with eGroups, a free email group
service. To complete your registration, we need to verify that your
email address is valid and that you do wish to register with our
service.
To continue
--
At 10:59 AM 10/7/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> You've yet to make a coherent argument that will stand on its own
I have presented examples of Chomsky citing vaguely specified sources that
supposedly provide evidence for all sorts of astonishing things, supposedly
provide evidence for the
--
At 08:36 PM 10/7/2000 -0700, James A.. Donald wrote:
Chomsky before 1979: (falsely purporting to be quoting "highly qualified
specialists")
: : executions have numbered at most in the thousands; that
: : these were localized in areas of limited Khmer Rouge
: : influence and u
--
At 09:55 PM 10/7/2000 -0400, Reese wrote:
> You are the entity making the allegations, yet Chomsky remains as
> accredited in some circles as he ever was.
Chomsky made some remarkable claims, which I have quoted, for the
existence of some remarkable evidence.
So are you claiming that t
At 12:19 AM 08/10/00 -0400, James A.. Donald wrote:
>Chomsky made some remarkable claims, which I have quoted, for the
>existence of some remarkable evidence.
>
>So are you claiming that this alleged evidence seemingly cited by Chomsky
>exists, or are you denying that Chomsky claimed the exi
At 07:08 PM 10/6/00 -0700, M. Emad Ul Hasan wrote:
> Your anonymizer.com is blocked in Saudi Arabia via proxy.
>Can you tell me a way I can see this site
There are lots of open proxy servers, which will let you access
other sites by setting your web proxy to use them.
I don't have a list han
At 16:38 10/6/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote, in response to Robert Guerra:
>Again you show yourself to be uncritical of these claims. You don't "get it."
>[...]
>The solution is not a regimen of data privacy laws but tecnologies to
>enable consumers to remain private. Those who "give permission" for
I wrote in another thread:
>framework to reasonably exist. Cypherpunkish technology will create
>underground markets, anonymous distribution methods, and so on, and the
>only way to enforce such regulations will be for the Feds/Mounties to take
>drastic steps. (For instance, strong anonymity is
Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
> >... Restricting strong
> >anonymity means key escrow.)
>
> Perhaps I overstated my argument above. It seems to me that if the Feds
> want to restrict strong anonymity, they have some choices:
<>
> Anything else?
Routinely monitor communications lines. Allow unlimite
At 1:55 AM -0400 10/8/00, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
>I do hope Robert thinks through this. Or maybe this is another
>example of cypherpunk thinking not meshing well with Canada. Austin
>of ZKS spoke Wednesday here in DC, and his comments are relayed to
>me from another speaker who is sympatheti
32 matches
Mail list logo
