X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Jim Choate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It causes the photons emitted at the same time from the source to be
> received at different time, this interupts the ability of the receiver to
> correlate (i.e. verify coherence) them into a recognizable picture.
Huh? The photons fro
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Steve Furlong wrote:
> cost might be a little extra electricity. No funding is necessary unless
> the usage is so high that my ISP bitches at me. Personal time involved
> in maintaining the system will, I hope, be low; if it's more than
> negligible I won't be able to do it.
The quote it attributed to Clive Ponting's book on Churchill. So all
anyone has to do is check that.
Ponting is a reasonably well-known author it should be possible to find
the book and check page 132. Whether Ponting was telling the truth is
another matter - but he isn't Chomsky.
Nor is he a
Jim Choate wrote:
> Why in major disasters do prices go up, when it is clear this is contrary
> to the best interest of the market?
Because markets have no interests, the participants in them do. The
argument is exactly the same as that advanced by biologists against the
idea of group selection
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, dmolnar wrote:
> > but why would there be a continuing expense in this area?
>
> People will use your remailer to send spam and death threats.
> The recipients will contact you and your ISP. Repeatedly.
One of the ways to mitigate this risk is to set up your remailer in
mid
> --
> From: dmolnar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Steve Furlong wrote:
>
> > cost might be a little extra electricity. No funding is necessary unless
> > the usage is so high that my ISP bitches at me. Personal time involved
> > in maintaining the system will, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've written a small howto on holding a keysigning party
based on the use of GnuPG w/linux.
http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/gpg-party.html
It's version 1.00, so feedback (comments, suggestions,
corrections) sent to me individually would be
appre
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Kevin Elliott wrote:
>A
>cryptographically strong PRNG would then be a PRNG with a very large
>period and some way of reinjecting randomness to guarantee the device
>never begins to recycle.
>--
>
Isn't that a misnomer though? If randomness is reinjected to
prevent th
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Kevin Elliott wrote:
>Actually if you can pull that off you've got yourself a darn fine
>real random number generator- any PRNG has to have some period after
>which it will begin to recycle (assuming no other randomness in
>introduced into the system), in which case you j
At 10:48 AM -0400 on 10/3/00, Trei, Peter wrote:
> The only bad point:
>
> * All recipients need to have key pairs. Thus, a crypto-only remailer
> can't be a terminal remailer to mailing lists, newsgroups, or
> individuals without keypairs.
Not a problem, one would think. Just need to have a ke
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Steve Furlong wrote:
> Does anyone have any suggestions for setting up an anonymous remailer?
You can get the source for the current version of Mixmaster (2.9b23) via
anonymous FTP from mixmaster.anonymizer.com.
Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for info on the
remop mailing l
> --
> From: R. A. Hettinga[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 3:59 PM
> To: Trei, Peter; Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: RE: Anonymous Remailers cpunk
>
> At 10:48 AM -0400 on 10/3/00, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
>
> > The only bad point:
At 07:58 AM 10/3/00 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
>I also thought of an example where a famine was averted due to government
>intervention.
>The current hurricane in Belize. Had the government not stepped in and
>'price fixed' the stores would have been depleted and cached by the few a
>week ago.
Does
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Marcel Popescu wrote:
> Huh? The photons from my TV screen arrive all at different times, and yet
> the picture is pretty good :)
No, they don't. The electron beam scans across your screen in a VERY
tightly sychronized dance. Vertical retrace, horizontal retrace, etc. Each
s
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Ken Brown wrote:
> Because markets have no interests, the participants in them do.
There is NO difference between a 'market' and the 'participants in them'.
Silly pseudo-economics.
News at Bacalao.net - Lo nuevo en Bacalao.net
--
http://bacalao.net
NEW MARKETING OPPORTUNITY!
--
We are pleased to announce a FREE interactive service in our web site
(http://bacalao.net) for seafood industry pro
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Trei, Peter wrote:
> I would like to suggest that a remailer could eliminate nearly all it's
> problems by only sending out encrypted mails - that is, if after
> removing the encryption that was applied using it's own private
> key, it finds that the result is plaintext, it
As Steve Wynn of Mirage Resorts Says,
The Only Way To Make Money In A Casino Is To Own One.
Consider These Two Facts:
1. Internet use is continuing to explode! Itÿ92s estimated that a million
new people every day are joining the hundreds of millions already
online.
2. Legalized gam
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200-2915049.html?tag=st.ne.1002.thed.ni
Sony loses appeal in PlayStation copyright fight
By Bloomberg News October 2, 2000, 9:15 a.m. PT
WASHINGTON--Sony today lost a U.S. Supreme Court bid to limit rivals from using
reverse engineering to create competing p
> --
> From: Jim Choate[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
> > I would like to suggest that a remailer could eliminate nearly all it's
> > problems by only sending out encrypted mails - that is, if after
> > removing the encryption that was a
Jim Choate wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
> > I would like to suggest that a remailer could eliminate nearly all it's
> > problems by only sending out encrypted mails - that is, if after
> > removing the encryption that was applied using it's own private
> > key, it finds th
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Steve Furlong wrote:
> Why not just read the first 20 bytes of the body? If 90% or more aren't
> printable ASCII assume the message is encrypted.
So, how come all of a sudden we're injecting algorithms that the users
must know to even access the network? What sort of regulat
GET YOUR OWN 100 MEG WEBSITE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH TODAY!
STOP PAYING $19.95 or more TODAY for your web site, WHEN YOU CAN
GET ONE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH!
DO YOU ALREADY HAVE A WEBSITE? ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS TRANSFER THE
DOMAIN TO OUR SERVERS AND UPLOAD YOUR DATA AND YOU ARE READY TO
G
At 10:26 PM 10/3/00 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Bill Stewart wrote:
>> Remember that we're talking about detecting spam on *outgoing* messages -
>
>No, we're not. We ARE talking bout checking incoming messages to ensure
>the body of the message is encrypted. No unencrypted traffi
--
At 02:23 AM 10/3/2000 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
> But if Chomsky were in the habit of making up or "massaging" quotes,
> perhaps he wouldn't give full reference information even for real
> quotes. That way, when he did make up a quote, the lack of full cite
> wouldn't count as a dat
--
James A. Donald:
> > You are putting ordinary dictatorships, like Pinochet's Chile or
> > Park's Korea, in the same category as communist dictatorships,
> > like Castro's Cuba or Mengistu's Ethiopia. That is ridiculous.
01:02 PM 10/3/2000 +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
> You really are a pr
TIRED OF ENDLESSLY POSTING YOUR ONLINE CLASSIFIED AD AND GETTING
NO RESULTS?
The fact is there are over 7000 such sites scattered about the web
and frankly none of them generate enough traffic to be worth your
while. Even when someone does find or visits one of these sites, your
ad is hopeless
At 05:22 PM 10/3/2000, Steve Furlong wrote:
...
>I'm assuming there's a way to tell with minimal difficulty if a message
>is encrypted, without relying on an easily-spoofed X header line.
>Perhaps someone who knows more about all of the many message protocols
>can weigh in here.
...
Excuse me for
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Ryan McBride wrote:
> Mixmaster can be installed in the low-maintenance
> `middleman' mode. In that mode, it will send mail to
> other remailers only, to avoid complaints about
> anonymous messages.
>
> Obviously
29 matches
Mail list logo
