On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, BENHAM TIMOTHY JAMES wrote:
>A human can easily remember 26 random letters from a 32 character
>alphabet with a little mnemonic method (eg map each character to a
>word so that it makes up some sort of dumb story). 5*26==130 which
>is more bits than computers can currently e
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, David Marshall wrote:
>Crack cocaine is made using a relatively simple procedure which changes
>that equilibrium to where almost all of it blows into the brain at
>once. This is why crack cocaine is considered worse than the "regular"
>powder.
'Freebasing' wasn't it? Cook in
If I remember correctly - the formula is simple enough. 1 part
(unit) cocain for every 10 parts (units) of baking soda. Mix well - add
water until you have a paste - then smear past on flat baking pan - place
in oven until mixture hardens (no I don't remember the temperture one
uses - but it wo
Said by Sampo Syreeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-- begin quote --
>Crack cocaine is made using a relatively simple procedure which changes
>that equilibrium to where almost all of it blows into the brain at
>once. This is why crack cocaine is considered worse than the "regular"
>powder.
'Freebasing'
At 04:17 PM 9/3/00 -0400, David Marshall wrote:
>On the topic of the blood-brain barrier, another example is compounds
There's also a trick where you can add an acetyl group to a small
molecule (not protein) to increase transport. Do it to salicylic
acid, you get aspirin. Do it to morphine, you
>> At 09:14 AM 9/2/00 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
>> ><>
>> >As the President has made clear, encryption software is
>> >regulated because it has the technical capacity to encrypt data and
>> >by that jeopardize American security interests, not because of its
>> >expressive content. Exec. Order
I'm telling you I'm leaving, and why.
1. The list appears to be USA-centric, and Internet covers the whole world.
2. I'm not bragging around about what illegal I did (if I ever did) and why
I think I'm right (of course I am! ;->) and why the other guys are wrong
(of course they are, indeed! ;->
"Marcello 'R.D.O.' Magnifico" wrote:
>
> I'm telling you I'm leaving, and why.
Don't let the doorknob hit you in the ass on the way out.
That being said, you make some points worth addressing.
> 1. The list appears to be USA-centric, and Internet covers the whole world.
True, both parts. How
At 4:06 PM -0700 9/3/00, Marcello 'R.D.O.' Magnifico wrote:
>I'm telling you I'm leaving, and why.
>
>1. The list appears to be USA-centric, and Internet covers the whole world.
Anyon is free to post, even people from Italy. That there are very
few subscribers from Italy, or Botswana, or Gondwan
Ray Dillinger wrote:
> "Poor Man's Crypto", possibly even better than digital crypto,
> may consist in creating an artificial language together, and
> then using it whenever you don't want to be eavesdropped on.
cf my remarks and questions on the use of Lojban for a personal log.
Lojban is an art
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Marcello 'R.D.O.' Magnifico wrote:
>3. I expected a lot of tech issues and found instead a bunch of:
> -discussions on racism, religion, gov't behavior worldwide
> -"we hate pigs"
> -US local laws discussions (see 1)
> -simple fluff and/or flaming.
At 4:38 PM -0400 9/4/00, Steven Furlong wrote:
>Ray Dillinger wrote:
>> "Poor Man's Crypto", possibly even better than digital crypto,
>> may consist in creating an artificial language together, and
>> then using it whenever you don't want to be eavesdropped on.
>
>cf my remarks and questions o
10 MILLION
EMAIL ADDRESSES
FOR ONLY $99
You want to make some money?
we can put you in touch with over 10 million people at virtually no cost.
Can you make one cent from each of theses names?
If you can you have a profit of over $250,000.00
That's right, we have 10 Mil
At 05:18 PM 9/4/00 -0400, Tiarnan O Corrain wrote:
>Perhaps my analogy of New York and Californain
>English was misleading
The difference there is more in what and how they
conceptualize, rather than being simply linguistic.
:-) :-P
At 04:24 PM 9/4/00 -0400, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> Deciphering
>an unknown langauge, not related to known languages, when it is
>written in an unknown script is a feat of linguistics that
>transcends mere cryptanalysis and has, so far, rarely or never
>been done.
Don't the linguists typicall
At 05:34 PM 9/4/00 -0400, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
>I'm with him, actually, about list content. I had hoped to find
>tech discussions going on.
There are tech discussions on this list regularly, mixed with
the sociopolitical rants and spam. You are not paying attention.
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, David Honig wrote:
> At 05:34 PM 9/4/00 -0400, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> >
> >I'm with him, actually, about list content. I had hoped to find
> >tech discussions going on.
>
> There are tech discussions on this list regularly, mixed with
> the sociopolitical rants and spam.
At 04:06 PM 9/3/00, Marcello 'R.D.O.' Magnifico wrote:
>I'm telling you I'm leaving, and why.
>1. The list appears to be USA-centric, and Internet covers the whole world.
The standard way to fix problems like that is to post non-USA-centric
content :-)
>3. I expected a lot of tech issues and fo
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Alan Olsen wrote:
> Actually the spam is an experiment is stegonography. (But only some of
> them.) How to tell the difference is left as an exercise for the reader.
ah, and let me guess -- we can tell which of us have extra computing power
in our basement by seeing who c
19 matches
Mail list logo
