Re: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-14 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: "Jim Choate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Which raises a philosophical question, how would a Christian Anarchist > resolve the conflict in their beliefs? What conflict? I'm a Christian anarchist, you made me curious... > Simply taking the law away won't make people honest, no

Re: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-14 Thread Marcel Popescu
X-Loop: openpgp.net From: "dmolnar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I expect that Marcel Popescu will rise to this, but... :) > Another way of looking at this is to recognize God's authority as so > important that merely human authority must fall by the wayside. Then > reject the notion of a theocracy ru

Re: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-14 Thread dmolnar
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Marcel Popescu wrote: > > Look at what happened to Lloyd's of London. > > What happened? The "names" (investors) of Lloyd's of London had unlimited liability for the losses of the firm, "right down to the last cufflink." No one noticed or cared much while Lloyd's was doin

tapping (was Re: 'Carnivore' Eats Your Privacy)

2000-07-14 Thread David Honig
At 12:26 AM 7/14/00 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote: >(resend) > >Michael: Have you forgotten what list you're on? > >Unlawful government eavesdropping should not primarily be fought in >Washington. It should be fought with technology. The ACLU and EPIC are >good for defensive battles only, and when

Re: Eudora spyware?

2000-07-14 Thread Benjamin M. Brewer
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, negafoo wrote: > I've tried WinDump, but it only binds to the Loopback Adapter. I'm > still looking for a packet > sniffer that will intercept the dial-up PPP connection (or hints that > will bind the Loopback > to the DUN connection... my bindings have been rearranged accord