> >Simply fill one of the lower legs of the platfrom with
> >mercury, and a little high explosives. Have a panic button in the ops
> >center. The SAS lands, and 1000 gallons of pure mercury are blasted
> >out into the channel. That wouldn't be nice.
>
>Plays heck with your mercury delay li
At 05:46 PM 6/12/00 -0400, David Marshall wrote:
>Libertarian ideals are something altogether different as are, I would
>assume, the more refined anarchist ideals.
A libertarian accepts a minimal government to protect against
nonconsensual acts (violence, fraud) and invasion. An anarchist
favors
At 06:34 PM 6/12/00 -0400, David Marshall wrote:
At the press conference, the government just
>tells the truth:
Gimme a break. The crater was a 'federal day care center',
at least on the first floor...
When you read about losing laptops in Los Alamos (and London), you have
to wonder: why don't those folks encrypt their drives? They
are somehow thinking physical security is sufficient, and slacking
off otherwise.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 12:12:01PM -0400, David Honig wrote:
>
> When you read about losing laptops in Los Alamos (and London), you have
> to wonder: why don't those folks encrypt their drives? They
> are somehow thinking physical security is sufficient, and slacking
> off otherwise.
>
The lap
At 02:20 PM 6/13/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> While we're fantasizing, let's imagine that it uses some kind of crypto
>> credential system to prevent abuse. Is this feasible?
>
>What do you mean by "abuse"?
Abuse in such a system definable, e.g., someone who pretends to be someone
els
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Criticizing the company is not disloyal. Turning up the heat when they
> fail to follow through on their promises is not unfriendly. Cypherpunks
> are actually helping their friends and allies within ZKS when they plainly
> state how unacceptable is the current state
Tim May wrote:
> (Is it readily available now? Is the Mac version out yet? I know
> someone was talking about using the Windows version running inside a
> password-secured Windows session on a Mac--using either Virtual PC or
> SoftWindows--but I haven't seen this user mentioning this in a while.
David Honig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you read about losing laptops in Los Alamos (and London), you have
> to wonder: why don't those folks encrypt their drives? They
> are somehow thinking physical security is sufficient, and slacking
> off otherwise.
The recent uproar over two hard d
Apple is taking a customer survey which features to add to the next
generation Apple AirPort (IEEE 802.11). The current version only does weak
crypto. You can cast your vote for strong crypto here:
http://survey.apple.com/AirPort/
--Lucky
Mr May:
>Will they sign up tens of millions?
>
>Myself, I'm wondering if they'll sign up a fraction of the 300,000
>they need at minimum. Ever, not just per year.
"Freedom 1.1 is currently available for Windows 95 or 98 only."
It's been what, a year now? No Unix/Linux/Solaris cl
>I hate press releases more than most folks. A well-known
>Cypherpunks-dominated company used to issue press releases in which
>the press release would have commentary from the president, almost as
>if a reporter was writing the story.
You probably know this already, as I assume it was be
Declan wrote about the ZKS burn rate:
> Offsetting that, as an income stream, would be the deals with ISPs and a
> probably relatively small revenue stream from individual subscribers. I
> don't see either as generating tens of millions of dollars. In a pinch,
> they could raise more cash in a hur
Anon wrote:
> The well intentioned kindness and patience which cypherpunks have
> expressed towards ZKS is undoubtedly a major contributing factor for
> why so little has been done to address the privacy lapses which Tim
> May describes. Cypherpunks have themselves to blame for allowing this
> to
petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the SAS are coming through the front door, you just went bankrupt.
>
> If England, France, Belgium etc. *new* that you would dump a
> massively toxic witches brew into their fishing waters, they might
> make sure that you weren't invaded by gu
>petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If the SAS are coming through the front door, you just went bankrupt.
>>
>> If England, France, Belgium etc. *new* that you would dump a
>> massively toxic witches brew into their fishing waters, they might
>> make sure that you weren't invaded b
16 matches
Mail list logo
