Marcel Popescu wrote:
> Irrelevant. We're not interested in bacteria, but in humans. And we're not
> interested in 7 billion years from now on, but in (at most) the next hundred
> years. Given the current technology, we could feed probably 1,000 billion
> people, and there's room for much more tha
>
>at the current standard of living for canada, we would ALREADY need two
>ADDITIONAL earths to sustain the CURRENT world population.
>
>even without a change in standards of living, given current growth and
>the nature of exponential functions, we will exhaust this planet's
>resources ca. 200 y
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Patrick Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> As far as the raid goes, I support it. A 6-year-old child belongs
> >> with his father or mother. The uncles and cousins had no standing,
> >> period.
>
> >You're a fucking idiot.
>
> Pleas
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yep. Good bye.
Look, everyone, I'm putting him in my killfile too! [I can't do that without
saying it publicly, this would ruin the effect, right?]
Tim, I used to admire you. Sadly, it looks that I'm the only fucking
anarchist left on Ea
At 01:04 PM 4/25/00 -0400, Marcel Popescu wrote:
>Irrelevant. We're not interested in bacteria, but in humans.
The difference between bacteria and humans is that some humans
think they're different. Meat is meat.
And some of the humans think that, because a few percent has achieved
z.p.g. a
Tom Vogt wrote:
>
> Marcel Popescu wrote:
> > Irrelevant. We're not interested in bacteria, but in humans. And we're not
> > interested in 7 billion years from now on, but in (at most) the next hundred
> > years. Given the current technology, we could feed probably 1,000 billion
> > people, and t
At 12:42 PM 4/26/00 -0400, Jim Burnes wrote:
>Please, Tom. This is really getting tired. Malthus' theories were disproven
>years ago. Technology increases the population carrying capacity of the
>planet.
Polynomial vs. exponential growth. Exponential wins every time.
Besides, the genes are m
David Honig wrote:
>
> At 12:42 PM 4/26/00 -0400, Jim Burnes wrote:
> >Please, Tom. This is really getting tired. Malthus' theories were disproven
> >years ago. Technology increases the population carrying capacity of the
> >planet.
>
> Polynomial vs. exponential growth. Exponential wins eve
At 03:34 AM 26/04/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>Marcel Popescu wrote:
>> Irrelevant. We're not interested in bacteria, but in humans. And we're not
>> interested in 7 billion years from now on, but in (at most) the next
hundred
>> years. Given the current technology, we could feed probably 1,000 bill
At 04:09 PM 26/04/00 -0400, David Honig wrote:
>At 12:42 PM 4/26/00 -0400, Jim Burnes wrote:
>>Please, Tom. This is really getting tired. Malthus' theories were
disproven
>>years ago. Technology increases the population carrying capacity of the
>>planet.
>
>Polynomial vs. exponential growth. E
At 12:42 PM -0400 4/26/00, Jim Burnes wrote:
>
>Starvation and privation in most of Africa is almost a stereotype.
>
>Stick with a minimal government and something approaching english common
>law and we have goods and happiness aplenty.
There are some interesting issues normally neglected in the
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "David Honig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 01:04 PM 4/25/00 -0400, Marcel Popescu wrote:
> >Irrelevant. We're not interested in bacteria, but in humans.
>
> The difference between bacteria and humans is that some humans
> think they're different. Meat is meat.
I'm a Christ
12 matches
Mail list logo