>I'd say that Phill is summing up the facts rather nicely. To all those
>celebrating the "victory" of the largest Borg known to man (the USG) over
>Microsoft: if they can outlaw Windows, they can outlaw Linux. Anyway, at its
I found this http://www.2ndlawlib.org/journals/okslip.html
toda
Cyber Investigator
"EASY WAY TO FIND OUT ANYTHING ABOUT ANYONE"
Cyber Investigator TAKES YOU BEYOND WHAT SEARCH ENGINES CAN DO!
Cyber Investigator is an amazing new tool that allows you to find EVERYTHING you
ever wanted to know about your EMPLOYEES, FRIENDS, RELATIVES, SPOUSE,
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's pie-in-the-sky, but were I in the oval office, I'd declare martial
> law, kill all the bureaucratic agencies that aren't authorized by the
> constitution, burn the federal register, and put the states on notice -
> follow suit or else.
J
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I believe it was either Stalin or Goering who, when told the Catholic
> Church disapproved of their latest genocide, replied "So how many
> divisions does the Pope have?"
Stalin. The Pope won.
Mark
Choate wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Tim May wrote:
>
>> At 3:28 AM -0400 4/5/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
>> >Lucky Green wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'd say that Phill is summing up the facts rather nicely. To all those
>> >> celebrating the "victory" of the largest Borg known to man
>>(the USG) over
>> >> Micr
>Hardly. More along the lines of sheeple liking a pretty GUI, and
>right now there
>are no alternatives in their eyes. Show most users a *NIX box and
>they're gonna
>ask you why you're still using DOS... (True, I know a few that
>actually said that...)
So launch Xdm, and they never
>> >Based on Moore's Law, this means it will be secure on computers roughly
>> >10,000 times more powerful than today's systems. How likely is that?
>
>>Its not hard to imagine, if all we're talking about is brute force attacks.
>
>Those are essentially the numbers I came up with as well. Howeve
Burnes wrote:
>BTW: For 100 points name the three types of monopolies that can exist?
>Why can only one of them exist without govenment support? Why can
>only one of them exist temporarily?
Well, let's see if I can get this right, keeping in mind that
even though I'm a college graduate,
>But if you know of a better government to live under, might I humbly
>inquire as to why you CHOSE to live here? If I knew of a government
>which was more to my tastes, I'd make myself a citizen of it.
If they'd let you.
--
A quote from Petro's Archives:
Reeses Peices:
>Try saying something good about Reagan, I wanna see if you can.
He had good hair for a man his age.
--
A quote from Petro's Archives: **
If the courts started interpreting the Second Amendment the way they interpret
the First
>> > Or should we debate the meaning of "is" also?
>>
>> how about the meaning of "socialist"? at the moment, your definition of
>> it seems to be "everything outside of my personal opinion".
>
>I would define it as, to secure for the workers by hand or brain the full
>fruits of their labour by me
WARNING: Anyone Has Access!!!
Are you aware that anyone can access your computer, and
view your activities if you have accessed the WWW or simply
use the Internet for e-mail?
There is a software program that "secretly" records computer
activity in alarming detail. It records t
Sunder wrote:
>Sounds a lot like communism to me. Hell, if the "workers" commonly own
>something, it's communism. They don't work for themselves individually,
No, it's called "Employee Stock Purchase Plans" aka "Stock Options".
>monarchy, socialism, fascism, communism, dictatorship -
13 matches
Mail list logo
