> Compare the sum total of misery in this world to the sum total of happiness
and
> get back to me. Read some Schopenhauer and early Nietzsche, you'd probably
find
> a lot to agree with too.
What happiness ? Have you ever seen anyone happy (on this list) ?
Nietzsche admitted that he wrote the s
> Bah. If you've always found that the women who are willing to sleep with you
> are
Look, I was discussing the meaning of "need" and pointlessness of attaching
moral qualifications to that.
But I'll have to oink to be understood. Prayers to the Godess of Semantics
didn't help.
> not spare your
ations are bollocks unless panocoptincons and
regular stings/tests are done.Hanssen didnt tell the russkies anything they
couldnt have worked out them selves.
No response? Trawling for bigger game? pot bellied,aging brilliant thorns
in the side of your country? Then...'In praise of gold:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Morlock wrote:
Faustine wrote:
> > Too bad you seemed to have missed the entire point of the passage: if your
> > relationships are making you bitter and miserable, there's no sense in
> > blaming the other half of the human race for whatever weaknes
"...nothing more than a cop-out. So it seems to me, at any rate. ~Faustine. "
Like you last week (agent ?) faustine (cop-in?) Silence speaks volumes in
this house.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Morlock Elloi wrote:
Faustine wrote:
> Any relationship based on desperation or one partner's dysfunctional clingy
> need is a complete waste of time. So if you seem to be spending a lot of time
> around women who want to mash you down into a mold of
> Any relationship based on desperation or one partner's dysfunctional clingy
> need is a complete waste of time. So if you seem to be spending a lot of time
> around women who want to mash you down into a mold of some cartoonish happy-
> ever-after "ideal", perhaps it's time to look at why you ke
on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:21:07PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2001, at 19:13, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>
> > Pecunia, the latin word for money, comes from the Etruscian pecu, meaning,
cow.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > RAH
> >
>
> And of course the German word for money is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, November 26, 2001, at 07:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Faustine wrote:
>>> Not all women are golddiggers.
>> They're called 'old maids'. ALL women who are interested in a
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Petro wrote:
> On Monday, November 26, 2001, at 07:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Faustine wrote:
> >>> Not all women are golddiggers.
> >> They're called 'old maids'. ALL women who are interested in a
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Petro wrote:
> > Who was she? It's nice to see you're not bitter ;-/
>
> Why do you assume it was a she?
:)
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
On Monday, November 26, 2001, at 07:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Faustine wrote:
>>> Not all women are golddiggers.
>> They're called 'old maids'. ALL women who are interested in a
>> 'relationship' are 'golddiggers' in the sen
At 05:21 PM 11/26/01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Cows might have served well as currency for primitives like the
>Etruscans, but can you imagine using them today? I took
>a bus this morning, the fair was 1.10 and I only had paper money
>so they ripped me off 90 cents. But if I was an Etr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cows might have served well as currency for primitives like the
> Etruscans, but can you imagine using them today? I took
> a bus this morning, the fair was 1.10 and I only had paper money
> so they ripped me off 90 cents. But if I was an Etruscan, they
> would've take
>Cows might have served well as currency for primitives like the
>Etruscans, but can you imagine using them today? I took
>a bus this morning, the fair was 1.10 and I only had paper money
>so they ripped me off 90 cents. But if I was an Etruscan, they
>would've taken my whole cow!
More likely t
You should spend some time reading recent work on Chimp and Bonobo packs
and the inter-pack shenanigans the females go through (as well as the
mapping to human behaviour).
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> On a long road trip one night, I heard an extremely interesting long
> di
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Faustine wrote:
> Not all women are golddiggers.
They're called 'old maids'. ALL women who are interested in a
'relationship' are 'golddiggers' in the sense they want to 'change' the
other party.
--
___
On 23 Nov 2001, at 19:13, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> Pecunia, the latin word for money, comes from the Etruscian pecu, meaning, cow.
>
> Cheers,
> RAH
>
And of course the German word for money is Gelt, which means
Gold.
Cows might have served well as currency for primitives like the
Etruscans
On 21 Nov 2001, at 7:55, David Honig wrote:
> At 08:12 PM 11/20/01 -0500, Faustine wrote:
> >David wrote:
> >George wrote:
> >
> >>>5) Gold makes women sleep with you. I don't know why they
> >>>like it, but they do.
> >>They sleep with you because of your large cattle herd only they
> >>have ac
> Not all women are golddiggers. I happen to think any woman who marries
> for money or sleeps around for gifts and dinners is worse than a whore.
> As the old saw goes, at least real prostitutes are honest about what they're
> doing.
>
> The only "abstracted value" I find really intriguing is t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David wrote:
George wrote:
>>5) Gold makes women sleep with you. I don't know why they
>>like it, but they do.
>They sleep with you because of your large cattle herd only they
>have accepted abstracted value and settle for gold or stocks...
Not al
At 07:03 PM 11/19/01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 19 Nov 2001, at 17:40, Tim May wrote:
>
>> On Monday, November 19, 2001, at 05:03 PM, David Honig wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, but what this thread has ignored is that gold (and other
>> > densely precious things) were valued *in and of themselves*
On 19 Nov 2001, at 17:40, Tim May wrote:
> On Monday, November 19, 2001, at 05:03 PM, David Honig wrote:
> >
> > Yes, but what this thread has ignored is that gold (and other
> > densely precious things) were valued *in and of themselves* and so
> > using them as money was not symbolic. You trad
23 matches
Mail list logo
