Greg Broiles wrote:
>
> At 09:23 PM 9/27/00 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
> >You claim that the man's swearing at the woman didn't violate any law,
> >so she can't sue. That's probably false under Michigan criminal law
> >(anti-cussing law and disturbing the peace, according to the DA; I don't
> >
Tim May wrote:
>
> At 9:23 PM -0400 9/27/00, Steven Furlong wrote:
> >
Tim:
> > > The point being that civil cases for damages should not be allowed
> >> for NONCRIMINAL issues. That is, a "matter of law" should be involved.
> >So, you're setting yourself up as the sole arbiter of the right?
At 9:23 PM -0400 9/27/00, Steven Furlong wrote:
>
> > The point being that civil cases for damages should not be allowed
>> for NONCRIMINAL issues. That is, a "matter of law" should be involved.
>>
>> Example: a bookstore owner sues because another bookstore moved in
>> across the street from
At 09:23 PM 9/27/00 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
>You claim that the man's swearing at the woman didn't violate any law,
>so she can't sue. That's probably false under Michigan criminal law
>(anti-cussing law and disturbing the peace, according to the DA; I don't
>say I agree with it)
Hmm, maybe
Tim May wrote:
>
> At 8:45 AM -0400 9/27/00, Steve Furlong wrote:
> >I do not think the woman should be filing suit. She should have ignored
> >the boor or, if her command of invective sufficed, told him off
> >scathingly. I do, however, support the right of people to take matters
> >to civil cou
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (Seriously, I say you should GET THE FUCK out of this law school you
> are now in. Too many damned lawyers as it is. If you really think, as
> you claimed a few weeks ago, that you can study law and then somehow
> affect the law/programmin
At 8:45 AM -0400 9/27/00, Steve Furlong wrote:
>
> In the year or so I've been posting on c-punks, you have several
>times mentioned that I had a good point but not once had you suggested
>that I should be killed. I was starting to feel left out.
>
>I do not think the woman should be filing suit.
Tim May wrote:
>
> At 8:37 PM -0400 9/26/00, Steve Furlong wrote:
> >"A. Melon" wrote:
> >> Michigans Anti-Cussing Law Called Into Question
> >
> >< >woman after she asked him not to swear near a small child. He might be
> >charged under MI's anti-swearing law or under disturbing the peace.>>
>
