At 05:07 PM 03/22/2002 +, Adam Back wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:38:57PM -0500, Matt Curtin wrote:
> > Adam Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Anyone explored NoCeM's?
> >
> > Maybe the thing to do would be to have an NNRP Cypherpunk node that
> > understands NoCeM messages.
>
>I
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:38:57PM -0500, Matt Curtin wrote:
> Adam Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Anyone explored NoCeM's?
>
> Maybe the thing to do would be to have an NNRP Cypherpunk node that
> understands NoCeM messages.
>
> I believe that `cleanfeed' is the software Adam cites to
Adam Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone explored NoCeM's?
Many moons ago, I was frustrated to no end with the issue of spam on
Usenet, and wasn't particularly keen on the present system of
third-party cancels and its ramifications. It was in such a mindset
that I discovered the NoCeM int
Igor wrote:
> Would not be an act of disconnecting other nodes be an act of
> proprietorship also?
>
> I personally think that a separate filtered list would be a better
> solution, more choice and all.
Yes perhaps.
There is a technology, and in theory it should work, and was designed
for distr
