On 23 Mar 2002 at 9:26, Anonymous wrote:
> Also, you have not distinguished clearly one of the main differences
> between the Napster-type file sharing networks and what you are calling
> storage-surface networks (what does "surface" mean here anyway?).
> The difference is that in the latter yo
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If mojo failed in the way, and for the reasons you describe, the
> failure was not that it was money like, but that it was
> insufficiently money like. Since the value of mojo was
> indefinite, its value could never be well matched to its purpose.
--
On 23 Mar 2002 at 9:26, Anonymous wrote:
> Not all of these are still going but it shows that there is a
> lot more in the P2P file sharing and publishing world than just
> a few moldering old cypherpunk projects from the 90s. P2P has
> really passed the cypherpunk world by.
>
> As far
At 09:26 AM 3/23/2002 +0100, Anonymous wrote:
>As far as the economics, one of the main lessons of the failure of Mojo
>Nation was that Mojo didn't work, or perhaps you might say it worked too
>well. It caused nothing but problems for the operators of the network.
>People tried to horde it, they
Adam Back writes:
> Here's something I wrote up the other night with my thoughts about the
> differences between peer-to-peer networks vs the more ambitious
> storage surface type propsals and the design criteria which one might
> entertain designing against.
>
> http://www.cypherspace.org
>On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Morlock Elloi wrote:
>Sharing copyrighted material in order to get the same is the only working
example that I can see. If someone can point to reason why large number of
people would give a fuck about fighting censorship, enhancing privacy and
anonymity,
At 03:43 PM 3/22/02 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Morlock Elloi wrote:
>
>>> Suggestions for more criteria welcome.
>>
>> Motivation.
>>
>> I cannot find a non-computer paradigm that relates to sharing
in-house
>> private
>> resources with unknown others. This may
> Sharing copyrighted material in order to get the same is the only working
> example that I can see. If someone can point to reason why large number of
> people would give a fuck about fighting censorship, enhancing privacy and
> anonymity, I'd like to be enlightened. With working real-world exam
Here's something I wrote up the other night with my thoughts about the
differences between peer-to-peer networks vs the more ambitious
storage surface type propsals and the design criteria which one might
entertain designing against.
http://www.cypherspace.org/p2p/
Suggestions for more c
