Tim May wrote:
On Dec 14, 2003, at 6:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I've been admiring your and Tim's contributions, and I was
wondering if
either of you were planning to subscribe to the (new) news list.
http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
No, we don't need a "cpunx-news"
At 09:57 PM 12/14/03 -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
>> Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
>
>Cookies, "members only" archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very
few
>consumers here.
But look how many IP addresses he got from members checking it out!
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:52:52AM -0500, V Alex Brennen wrote:
> Archive it your selfs you fucking wankers. Damn. Since when
That was I was going to do before you volunteered to host the lists.
Thanks for letting me know that the offer has been withdrawn.
I guess I don't need another illustra
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
Cookies, "members only" archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very few
consumers here.
"
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:36:12PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
> No, we don't need a "cpunx-news" list. This is what Google and the
> ability to see hundreds of various lists and sites is for.
This is a bogus statement. As long as I can't use a single keyword to make
Google's news alerts topical, and _
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:00:57PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
> Some people think spinning off new lists whenever they get interested
> in some area is interesting. Most of these lists fail for obvious
There's a specific niche of high-volume topical news lists. They're designed
to distribute the minin
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
> > http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
> >
> > Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
>
> Cookies, "members only" archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very few
> consumers here.
"To s
> http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
>
> Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
Cookies, "members only" archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very few
consumers here.
=
end
(of original message)
Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam fol
