At 9:00 AM -0400 8/3/00, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/02/00
>at 02:26 PM, sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>At work, we've received several beat up packages delivered through UPS,
>>etc. I suppose service is better in some states than in others...
>
>In all l
At 12:59 AM 8/1/00 -0400, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>Try completely ignoring your paper mail sometime and see how
>long it is before you're in trouble with the law for missing
>a jury duty summons or a bill or some legal action or other.
UDP, baby.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/02/00
at 02:26 PM, sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Here in NYC I routinely saw UPS guys tossing boxes back and forth to each
>other, sometimes dropping them on the concrete. I'm never able to get
>UPS to deliver anything at any convenient time, usually I'm lef
Tim May wrote:
>
> At 9:58 PM -0700 7/31/00, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> >
> >Try completely ignoring your paper mail sometime and see how
> >long it is before you're in trouble with the law for missing
> >a jury duty summons or a bill or some legal action or other.
>
> I was called _once_ for jury d
Ray Dillinger wrote:
> No one has yet died of spam, one case of an irate recipient
> murdering a spammer notwithstanding.
!!!
Do you have any details? A URL would be perfect. I'd include a one-
liner and the URL in my friendly warnings to annoying spammers. (Yes,
that's redundant.) If they don't
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 10:50:12PM -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
> Technology is not needed. Once every American has access to an
> internet connection, thanks to the benevolent government's phone
> surcharge, and everyone has a permanent email address, thanks to our
> wise government's far-seeing
Anonymous wrote:
>
> Fuck, no traffic on cpunks except this ...
>
> >Actually, it is the U.S. Postal Service. Officials there are planning
> >to offer people living at all 120 million of the nation's residential
> >street addresses free e-mail addresses. It would link the e-mail and
>
> The stu