Re: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-17 Thread Bill Stewart
At 12:58 AM 6/17/00 -0400, Rev Simon Rumble wrote: >On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 01:02:34AM -0400, petro uttered: > >I think the other options are places that are already Permanent >Autonomous Zones like Christiantown in Copenhagen. Not sure how many >other places there are like that... But the Free

Re: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-13 Thread petro
>petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> If the SAS are coming through the front door, you just went bankrupt. >> >> If England, France, Belgium etc. *new* that you would dump a >> massively toxic witches brew into their fishing waters, they might >> make sure that you weren't invaded b

Re: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-13 Thread David Marshall
petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the SAS are coming through the front door, you just went bankrupt. > > If England, France, Belgium etc. *new* that you would dump a > massively toxic witches brew into their fishing waters, they might > make sure that you weren't invaded by gu

Re: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-13 Thread David Honig
At 06:34 PM 6/12/00 -0400, David Marshall wrote: At the press conference, the government just >tells the truth: Gimme a break. The crater was a 'federal day care center', at least on the first floor...

RE: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-13 Thread petro
> >Simply fill one of the lower legs of the platfrom with > >mercury, and a little high explosives. Have a panic button in the ops > >center. The SAS lands, and 1000 gallons of pure mercury are blasted > >out into the channel. That wouldn't be nice. > >Plays heck with your mercury delay li

Re: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-12 Thread David Marshall
David Honig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 01:50 AM 6/12/00 -0400, Sean Roach wrote: > >Nah! That would be environmental terrorism. > > Not terrorism if you're at war. Look at what the US leaves > around after a spat. > > I guess defoliating south asia wasn't environmental terrorism bec

RE: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-12 Thread David Honig
At 01:50 AM 6/12/00 -0400, Sean Roach wrote: >Nah! That would be environmental terrorism. Not terrorism if you're at war. Look at what the US leaves around after a spat. I guess defoliating south asia wasn't environmental terrorism because we are Amerikans, ja? And all those cute perfectl

RE: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-11 Thread Bill Stewart
> Simply fill one of the lower legs of the platfrom with >mercury, and a little high explosives. Have a panic button in the ops >center. The SAS lands, and 1000 gallons of pure mercury are blasted >out into the channel. That wouldn't be nice. Plays heck with your mercury delay line memor

RE: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-11 Thread Sean Roach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 09:27 PM 6/11/00 -0400, you wrote: >>Lucky: >> >> >I agree with Peter in that Sealand may wish to consider adding a >> nuke to >> >their budget of small arms. Nuclear powers are the only >> sovereigns that >> >command any kind of respect from

RE: Trusting HavenCo [was: Sealand Rant] CPUNK

2000-06-11 Thread petro
>Lucky: > > >I agree with Peter in that Sealand may wish to consider adding a nuke to > >their budget of small arms. Nuclear powers are the only sovereigns that > >command any kind of respect from the other members in the club. > >Kick that N up to BC arms so the start-up budget is doable. The