>>tip of downtown Manhattan is within a few > blocks of water on three
sides, And what do you think the effect of a close range nuclear blast will
be on a shallow bay filled with water...can you say drowned rat?
Rats can take 5 times the radiation levels of humans and breed faster,dont
write
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, John Young wrote:
> Moreover, the tip of downtown Manhattan is within a few
> blocks of water on three sides,
And what do you think the effect of a close range nuclear blast will be on
a shallow bay filled with water...can you say drowned rat?
--
_
Faustine wrote:
[...snip...]
> For all its propagandizing, I still think it's entirely possible to come away
> from that film convinced that as a nation we need more and better preparation,
> not less.
That's the point - you as a nation (the USA) might well have been able
to prepare for it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim wrote:
>Comment on the original thread title: It's bizarre to see politicians
>saying "We should have been told about the nuke suspected to be in NYC!"
>The smuggling of a nuke into D.C., the missing suitcase/demolition
>nukes, all that stuff,
>>Why the Atta bunch wasted their efforts on laborers in WTC rather than
creme-de-la-creme Park and 5th is a mysterious conspiracy.) <<
They finished the job that started in 93,and they were assisted by details
of the WTC structure that came out in the trial.
No wonder the State seeks secret t
If the nuke is placed at the NY Stock Exchange most New
Yorkers would not be affected by the blast due to the unusually
dense architecture surrounding the exchange -- much denser
than now allowed by zoning and building codes. And many of
the older buildings are substantially built of heavy stone
Comment on the original thread title: It's bizarre to see politicians
saying "We should have been told about the nuke suspected to be in NYC!"
The smuggling of a nuke into D.C., the missing suitcase/demolition
nukes, all that stuff, was a hot topic of discussion _here_ and in many
places. (Of
