Choate vs mattd [was: RE: The fucking essay]

2001-12-12 Thread Trei, Peter
This should be fun to watch. Let's hope the result is similar to the matchup of the Kilkenny cats. "There once were two cats of Kilkenny Each thought there was one cat too many So they fought and they fit, And they scratched and they bit, Till excepting their nails an

Re: The fucking essay

2001-12-12 Thread mattd
>>Clearly you've NEVER actually talked or read a psych book in the last 50 years. David Cooper,rd Laing,Konrad Lorenz,bf,Skinner,Erricson on identity.Dibs in search of self.whReich,steinem. Some of those I read ages ago but I read new scientist regularly and for the last 15 years.Freud is as

Re: The fucking essay

2001-12-11 Thread Jim Choate
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, mattd wrote: > "...the fucking essay. It's flawed in a variety of ways. It's understanding > of human psychology (which it purports to >manipulate in realistic ways - > not) is so flawed as to make it very tedious. > > Speaking o

The fucking essay

2001-12-11 Thread mattd
"...the fucking essay. It's flawed in a variety of ways. It's understanding of human psychology (which it purports to >manipulate in realistic ways - not) is so flawed as to make it very tedious. Speaking of tedious,Im on record with total opposition to freud being used