On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:07:40PM -0600, blah wrote:
> >> From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, crackpot:
> >On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
> >> From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is
> >> > -no- time.
> >>
>> From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, crackpot:
>On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
>> From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is
>> > -no- time.
>>
>> A photon has no "perspective".
>
> Yes it does. It is a
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
> From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
>
> > Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is
> > -no- time.
>
> A photon has no "perspective".
Yes it does. It is a particle and it interacts with
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
> >'instantaneously' from -whose- perspective?
>
> From anyone's perspective.
Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is -no-
time. It is clear from Relativity that as -anything- approaches the speed
of light it's mass grows larger (ph
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 00:28:46 -0600 (CST)
Jim Choate wrote:
> Tim May wrote...
>
>> "I don't believe, necessarily, in certain forms of the Copenhagen
>> Interpretation, especially anything about signals propagating
>> instantaneously,
>'instantaneously' from -whose- perspective?
From anyone's
