RE: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-17 Thread Peter Fairbrother
Peter Fairbrother (me) wrote (in a different thread): > BTW, m-o-o-t uses a randomised virtual keyboard with (both EM and optical) > TEMPEST resistant fonts. It's okay for inputting keys, but it's a hassle > for inputting text. > > Which means that your keys might be safe from keyloggers (both ha

RE: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-17 Thread Sunder
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Trei, Peter wrote: > Lets not forget optical TEMPEST - remember a few months ago, > when it was demonstrated that the image on a CRT could > be reconstructed just from the light it reflected on walls? The > point where the electron beam is hitting the phosphors is > much bri

RE: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-17 Thread Trei, Peter
> -- > From: Tyler Durden[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard > > I don&#

Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard(Tempest for eliza)

2003-07-16 Thread Sarad AV
(you don't have > anything that important > to hide anyway). Cheap, easy and scalable is the > only way to bumrush this > show. > > -TD > > > > > > > >From: Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Thomas Shaddack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-16 Thread Tyler Durden
D]> To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:01:22 -0400 (edt) On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Tyler Durden wrote: > "Anything displayed on your screen is visible to t

Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-16 Thread Major Variola (ret)
(resent) At 11:15 AM 7/16/03 -0700, Tim May wrote: >We've talked many times about using laptops, heads-up displays (like >the Sony glasses), and even putting mesh bags over a user and his >laptop. Actual Faraday cage rooms are not really needed. Don't forget the 3M screen-addons which are basicall

Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-16 Thread Tim May
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Sunder wrote: And TEMPEST monitoring equipment (or again, a hidden pinhole camera behind you, or a transmitter hidden in your monitor) won't see what's on your screen because From a purely optical perspective, pinhole cameras have terrible spatial r

Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-16 Thread Sunder
And TEMPEST monitoring equipment (or again, a hidden pinhole camera behind you, or a transmitter hidden in your monitor) won't see what's on your screen because --Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--- + ^ + :25Kliters anthrax, 38K liters botulinum toxin, 500

Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-16 Thread Thomas Shaddack
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Tyler Durden wrote: > This reminds me of another thing that occurred to me, but as I'm no computer > engineer I can't tell how much of a defense it would be. (At the very least > a nice stopgap for a while...) > > To get around keystroke loggers, it would be nice to have some f

RE: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-16 Thread Vincent Penquerc'h
> To get around keystroke loggers, it would be nice to have some fom of > onscreen keyboard, perhaps available over the web. The > keyboard would likely > work only with the mouse (making it slow to use, of course), > and each time > the keyboard appears (and at periodic intervals) the keyboar

Re: Sealing wax & eKeyboard

2003-07-16 Thread Tyler Durden
This reminds me of another thing that occurred to me, but as I'm no computer engineer I can't tell how much of a defense it would be. (At the very least a nice stopgap for a while...) To get around keystroke loggers, it would be nice to have some fom of onscreen keyboard, perhaps available over