Re: Science Journal 'Self-Censorship'

2003-02-18 Thread John Kelsey
At 06:58 PM 2/16/03 -0500, Pete Capelli wrote: http://abc.net.au/news/scitech/2003/02/item20030216103135_1.htm "Self-governance," the editors say, is "an alternative to government review of forthcoming journal articles." I don't edit any science journals, but I would expect there is no law requi

Re: Science Journal 'Self-Censorship'

2003-02-17 Thread Tim May
On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 02:46 AM, Pete Capelli wrote: Mike Rosing wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Pete Capelli wrote: http://abc.net.au/news/scitech/2003/02/item20030216103135_1.htm "Self-governance," the editors say, is "an alternative to government review of forthcoming journal art

Re: Science Journal 'Self-Censorship'

2003-02-17 Thread Pete Capelli
Mike Rosing wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Pete Capelli wrote: > > > http://abc.net.au/news/scitech/2003/02/item20030216103135_1.htm > > > > "Self-governance," the editors say, is "an alternative to government review > > of forthcoming journal articles." > > > > I don't edit any science journals, b

Re: Science Journal 'Self-Censorship'

2003-02-16 Thread Mike Rosing
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Pete Capelli wrote: > http://abc.net.au/news/scitech/2003/02/item20030216103135_1.htm > > "Self-governance," the editors say, is "an alternative to government review > of forthcoming journal articles." > > I don't edit any science journals, but I would expect there is no law >

Science Journal 'Self-Censorship'

2003-02-16 Thread Pete Capelli
http://abc.net.au/news/scitech/2003/02/item20030216103135_1.htm "Self-governance," the editors say, is "an alternative to government review of forthcoming journal articles." I don't edit any science journals, but I would expect there is no law requiring 'government review'. So what are the edito