Re: test please ignore

2003-07-02 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:11:05AM -0500, Harmon Seaver wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:04:28AM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote: > > Is it really quiet in here, or does the fact that I've been > > playing with procmail this evening have something to do with it? > > > > Thanks; Bill > >Oh oh

Re: test please ignore

2003-07-02 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:04:28AM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote: > Is it really quiet in here, or does the fact that I've been > playing with procmail this evening have something to do with it? > > Thanks; Bill Oh oh -- for some strange reason, all three messages in this thread got sent to

RE: test please ignore

2003-07-02 Thread Trei, Peter
> Declan McCullagh[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Pretty quiet. I'm going through back messages now and only saw I think > three from July 1. > > -Declan > > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:04:28AM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote: > > Is it really quiet in here, or does the fact that I've been > >

Re: test please ignore

2003-07-02 Thread Declan McCullagh
Pretty quiet. I'm going through back messages now and only saw I think three from July 1. -Declan On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:04:28AM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote: > Is it really quiet in here, or does the fact that I've been > playing with procmail this evening have something to do with it? > >