--- "J.A. Terranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> > --- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pretend you hate. But there is an up-side: you're too fucking stupid
> to
> > be of permanent use to the 'Stazi', and so you can anticpate outliving
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Steve Thompson wrote:
> --- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's an old pattern to character assassins: "I've attacked you
> > publically
> > but I really don't want to have defend what I've said or reply to
> > suggestions about my own motivation."
>
> And ps
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's an old pattern to character assassins: "I've attacked you
> publically
> but I really don't want to have defend what I've said or reply to
> suggestions about my own motivation."
And psychopaths are sometimes said to accuse their victims of
o nothing.
-TD
From: Steve Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Well, they got what they want...
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:32:57 -0400 (EDT)
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, apparently you hav
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, apparently you haven't been getting any of my posts to the
> Al-Qaeda
> node, otherwise the context would be clear.
I'm not even going to bother with you anymore. Your motivation is quite
clear enough, and any further bad-faith back-and-forth
Steve Schear wrote:
The term 'securisimilitude' (from verisimilitude) comes to mind.
Steve
True, but I think the goal was FUD and it worked.
On Tuesday (I think) both the Metro and AMNY free rags reported that all
of a sudden there was a rash of suspicious packages being reported. Ya
thi
Well, apparently you haven't been getting any of my posts to the Al-Qaeda
node, otherwise the context would be clear.
As for...
> Local authorities, however, can take these differences as meaningful and
> act
> upon them.
Yes they can. But should they?
From their perspective? Of course. I
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This premise, however, depends somewhat on the observation that the
> >so-called left and right-wing divisions of the political spectrum are
> >largely illusory. The most strident critics of diametric political
> >opposites in the press and elsewhere
At 06:17 PM 7/23/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
Saw a local security expert on the news, and he stated the obvious: Random
searches and whatnot are going to do zero for someone determined, but
"might" deter someone who was "thinking about" blowing up the A train. In
other words, everyone here in NYC
This premise, however, depends somewhat on the observation that the
so-called left and right-wing divisions of the political spectrum are
largely illusory. The most strident critics of diametric political
opposites in the press and elsewhere would disagree, but their very
occupations are rather
--- John Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Jul 23, 2005 9:17 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Well, they got what they want...
>
> ...
> >Saw a local security
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >From: Steve Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Well, they got what they want...
> >Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:01:30 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> >--- Tyler Durden <
John Kelsey wrote...
I think the reality is a bit different. The random searches
won't keep someone who's planning an attack from trying to
carry it out, but it may delay their attack, if they made
plans based on the old security setup, not the new one. It
may also convince them to shift the a
>From: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jul 23, 2005 9:17 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Well, they got what they want...
...
>Saw a local security expert on the news, and he stated the
>obvious: Random earches and whatnot are going
sunder wrote:
Tyler Durden wrote:
> In other words, everyone here in NYC knows that we've >
given up a lot for the sake of the appearence of security, but no one >
seems to give a damn.
I wouldn't say "we've given up" at all - after all, we've had no choice in
the matter. We
Tyler Durden wrote:
Saw a local security expert on the news, and he stated the obvious:
Random searches and whatnot are going to do zero for someone
determined, but "might" deter someone who was "thinking about" blowing
up the A train. In other words, everyone here in NYC knows that we've
giv
From: Steve Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Well, they got what they want...
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:01:30 -0400 (EDT)
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I'm sure most are aware that random searches has begun here in NYC,
--- Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I'm sure most are aware that random searches has begun here in NYC,
> at subway stations and in the LIRR. Contraband (drugs, etc...) can get
> the owner arrested. The next step, of course, will be to start grabbing
> anyone carrying terrorist propa
At 02:08 PM 7/22/2005, Duncan Frissell wrote:
entrance until you make it into
the system without a search. Or you can
decline to use government transportation entirely and call 212-777-
for
the Tel Aviv car service (most of who's drivers are the sons of Hagar
rather than the sons of Ruth
At 11:00 AM 7/22/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
OK, OK...so the police are
deterrents against a few lone crazy copycats, who don't have enough sense
to enter away from police line-of-site. But it sure seems damned silly to
be giving up constitutional protection for the sake of an image of
protection.
20 matches
Mail list logo
