At 11:42 AM 4/23/2005, James A. Donald wrote:
A procedure that was, of course, anonymous. You
probably made a deposit in cash.
Yes, of course :-) Writing a check would have been silly,
and Goldage.net doesn't accept them for bank deposits,
only for direct mailin. (They do accept bank wires,
but
--
On 22 Apr 2005 at 16:20, Bill Stewart wrote:
> Last time I wanted to use an online gold system, I
> used pecunix as the currency and goldage.net as the
> payment handler. That was partly because of the fees
> for the size of transactions I was doing (for small
> transactions, the minimum fe
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:15:06AM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> > The fact that webmoney takes security so seriously suggests to me
> > that they are honest - but, of course, the fact that they are russian
> > suggests .
> This isn't the middle of the Cold War anymore. I don't think they a
At 07:40 PM 4/20/2005, James A. Donald wrote:
Because webmoney takes security rather seriously, they do not accept
credit card transactions, which is a major pain. Nor can you convert
paypal to or from other internet moneys.
Last time I wanted to use an online gold system,
I used pecunix as the cu
Are you continuing those dots correctly? I assumed they were leading to the
words "Russian mob", which has become quite the powerful force in Brooklyn
these days.
-TD
From: "Shawn K. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WebMoney
Date: Thu, 21
ROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WebMoney
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:26:49 -0500
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 13:44 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Are you continuing those dots correctly? I assumed they were leading
> to the
> words "Russian mob", which has become quite the powerf
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Marcel Popescu wrote:
> Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's Russian, so
> not a lot of trust in there... on the other hand, it DOES mean it's
unlikely
> to bow to US pressure.
Any online payment service that has a convenient mech
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 13:44 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Are you continuing those dots correctly? I assumed they were leading
> to the
> words "Russian mob", which has become quite the powerful force in
> Brooklyn
> these days.
Even if they are the Russian mob, they're a lot more trustworthy tha
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 19:40 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
> The fact that webmoney takes security so seriously suggests to me
> that they are honest - but, of course, the fact that they are russian
> suggests .
This isn't the middle of the Cold War anymore. I don't think they are
that dishon
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Marcel Popescu wrote:
> > Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's
> > Russian, so not a lot of trust in there... on the other hand, it
> > DOES mean it's unlikely to bow to US pressure.
On 20 Apr 2005 at 19:23, Pawe Krawczyk wrote:
>
gt; Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:23 PM
> To: Marcel Popescu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WebMoney
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Marcel Popescu wrote:
>
> > Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's Russian,
> so
>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:20:46PM +0300, Marcel Popescu wrote:
> Second, has anyone seen http://www.wmtransfer.com/ ? Ok, it's Russian, so
> not a lot of trust in there... on the other hand, it DOES mean it's unlikely
> to bow to US pressure.
Haven't used it personally yet but in Russia it seems
Marcel Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, was there a black hole on this list, or am I the only one who isn't
> receiving any messages?
It seems to be working for me, just not much traffic lately.
--
Riad S. Wahby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
