Re: Skeptical about claim that stamp creation burns out modern CPUs

2004-01-01 Thread Tim May
On Jan 1, 2004, at 2:35 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote: Tim May wrote: I'm skeptical of this claim. A lot of Intel and AMD and similar machines are running full-tilt, "24/7." To wit, Beowulf-type clusters, the Macintosh G5 cluster that is now rated third fasted in the world, and so on. None of th

Re: Skeptical about claim that stamp creation burns out modern CPUs

2004-01-01 Thread James A. Donald
-- On 1 Jan 2004 at 10:44, Tim May wrote: > Further, junction-to-case temperature in a ceramic package > has a time constant of tens of seconds, meaning, the case > temperature reaches something like 98% of its equilibrium > value (as wattage reaches, say, 60 watts, or whatever), in > tens of s

Re: Skeptical about claim that stamp creation burns out modern CPUs

2004-01-01 Thread Tim May
On Jan 1, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Riad S. Wahby wrote: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now I grant you that I haven't tested CPUs in this way in many years. But I am skeptical that recent CPUs are substantially different than past CPUs. I would like to see some actual reports of "burned literally" C

Re: Skeptical about claim that stamp creation burns out modern CPUs

2004-01-01 Thread Riad S. Wahby
Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I grant you that I haven't tested CPUs in this way in many years. > But I am skeptical that recent CPUs are substantially different than > past CPUs. I would like to see some actual reports of "burned > literally" CPUs. I've never seen a "burned literall