On Wednesday 15 January 2003 18:09, Petro wrote:
> > Now, hunting black _helicopters_ is a different matter, you
> > realize
>
> What is the recommened minimum caliber for taking one, and how
> does one get it to the taxidermist?
I don't have a copy of _Unintended Consequences_ handy, but
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:29:22PM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> At 02:25 PM 01/13/2003 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
> >The hunting post was obviously a joke, as the final line made
> >clear. The real joke was that some readers would fail to see
> >that the first line was a joke, would believe that
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:22:12AM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
> > > Any time you post to a list of a bunch of people you don't know,
> > > you might be posting to a list of a bunch of people you don't like.
> >
--
On 14 Jan 2003 at 21:48, Tyler Durden wrote:
> My thought was that James is some kind of Fed. I suspect
> Chomsky is one guy they most don't want around these days.
> His accusations on the Chomsky dis website were
> technicalities and hair-splitting, even somantic.
Liar:
Chomsky claim
Holy shit! I could done better than this! (ie, I THOUGHT this would be
outrageous and amusing but it kinda sucked black prison dick.)
-TD
From: Sleeping Vayu - Vayu Anonymous Remailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Security cameras are getting smart -- and scar
]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Security cameras are getting smart -- and scary
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:13:32 -0600 (CST)
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
> For all I know, I've been posting on a list haunted by a bunch of
> crypto-white supremists (crypto, as
At 02:25 PM 01/13/2003 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
The hunting post was obviously a joke, as the final line made
clear. The real joke was that some readers would fail to see
that the first line was a joke, would believe that cypherpunks
really do go hunting black people.
Now, hunting black _he
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:30:48PM -0800, Todd Boyle wrote:
(snip)
> Just tell me why there's so many posts about guns,
> killing, racism, liberty and all that crap, when all
> we need is a decent electronic money system.
>
Just tell me why you're complaining about this on the cpunx list? Gu
--
On 13 Jan 2003 at 12:30, Todd Boyle wrote:
> What *was* your point in redistributing the "nigger killing"
> post from Cypherpunks, in the digital bearer settlement list?
> Does that have something to do with digital cash, or enhance
> your IBUC business somehow? Maybe, increasing traff
>Don't let the door hit you on the way out...
As usual, no intellectual response from the
mental cadaver of a once-relevant writer :-)
What *was* your point in redistributing the
"nigger killing" post from Cypherpunks, in the
digital bearer settlement list? Does that have
something to do with
At 5:04 PM -0800 on 1/12/03, Todd Boyle wrote:
> This is supposed
> to be a "Digital Bearer Settlement List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
> For that matter, is there any conceptual association between
> killing people, and payments with digital currencies?
>
> What's your point
>
> I thought you had
: U
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:30:17 -0800
Subject: Re: Security cameras are getting smart -- and scary
From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 12:55 PM, Sleeping Vayu - Vayu
Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> At 09:33 PM 01/
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 12:55 PM, Sleeping Vayu - Vayu
Anonymous Remailer wrote:
At 09:33 PM 01/10/2003 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
For all I know, I've been posting on a list haunted by a bunch of
crypto-white supremists (crypto, as in secret, hidden). And if that's
the case, then I wan
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
>
> > Any time you post to a list of a bunch of people you don't know,
> > you might be posting to a list of a bunch of people you don't like.
> > Reading the archives sometimes helps.
>
> A (hopefully) helpful
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
> Any time you post to a list of a bunch of people you don't know,
> you might be posting to a list of a bunch of people you don't like.
> Reading the archives sometimes helps.
A (hopefully) helpful hint for the newcomers to this list: Bill is usually
the
Some guy wrote
You are moron.
Care to be a little more specific? (I'm not afraid of a little criticism,
particularly if its constructive.)
Even if true, I don't see how that comment pertains to my reply.
For all I know, I've been posting on a list haunted by a bunch of
crypto-white sup
At 9:17 AM -0800 on 1/9/03, Bill Stewart wrote:
> I've usually been the one wearing the fedora in cooler weather,
> and a few people wore Red Hats back in the day.
Don't ever do it without your fez on?
:-).
Cheers,
RAH
Not that a fez would work very well for that kind of thing. Well, not
*that
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Steve Mynott wrote:
> Read the Rig Veda and break out the soma (if you know what it was).
Or better, what it is :-)
Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike
On Wednesday, Jan 8, 2003, at 22:10 Europe/London, Tyler Durden wrote:
Tim May wrote...
"Cowboy hats are much more common in Cypherpunks Bay Aryan meetings"
Uh...do you actually hold "Aryan" meetings? Is this a "white"
"supremist" thing, or will the following be welcome:
Iranians
Afghans
Mos
>SIgh. Although I read May's "Crypto Anarchy" piece and liked it, I am slowly
>coming to the conclusion that he's just another dimwitted fascist who by
>accident had a few interesting ideas.
You're Guilty for Not Doing Your Homework.
Mr. May's views on sick, disabled, niggers and women are avai
At 03:14 PM 01/08/2003 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 11:34 PM 1/8/03 +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
>I don't know the weaknesses of gait-observing systems, so I can't
suggest
>anything.
Kilts for men (over the knee, please, and not for aesthetics).
Hoop-skirts for women. A heavy backpack ca
Tim May wrote...
I've been seeing your nitwitticisms and shallow observations for several
weeks now. Time to plonk you. Bye.
And I can honestly say that based on Tim May's responses, he simply doesn't
"get" what I am saying most of the time.
In this case I wasn't actually being too clever.
I
At 11:34 PM 1/8/03 +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
>I don't know the weaknesses of gait-observing systems, so I can't
suggest
>anything.
Kilts for men (over the knee, please, and not for aesthetics).
Hoop-skirts for women. A heavy backpack carried asymmetrically
(for extra fun, use a canteen where t
> It doesn't matter what you wear. Even if everybody would be wearing a
> flowing robe and a face mask (fat chance; right now donning this would
> invite for some deep anal probing),
Not over some critical mass. Also could pit the media against the police,
if the rate of such incidents against no
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 02:10 PM, Tyler Durden wrote:
Tim May wrote...
"Cowboy hats are much more common in Cypherpunks Bay Aryan meetings"
Uh...do you actually hold "Aryan" meetings? Is this a "white"
"supremist" thing, or will the following be welcome:
Iranians
Afghans
Most peopl
Tim May wrote...
"Cowboy hats are much more common in Cypherpunks Bay Aryan meetings"
Uh...do you actually hold "Aryan" meetings? Is this a "white" "supremist"
thing, or will the following be welcome:
Iranians
Afghans
Most people hailing from Northern India
Turks
And for that matter, what abou
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 11:40 AM, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 10:28 AM -0800 on 1/8/03, James A. Donald wrote:
Men's fashions, however, change at the speed of glaciers, so
there is little chance of that becoming acceptable for men.
All we need is the return of the fedora, I'd bet, as
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
> In today's Vietnam women commonly dress like Ninjas, completely
> covering every square inch of skin. Even the eyes are covered
> with dark glasses. The costume however is tight, covering the
> face but revealing the figure.
It doesn't matter what
"James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sarad AV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Shaddack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Security cameras are getting smart -- and scary
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:40:20 -0500
At 10:28 AM -0800 on 1/8/03, James A. Donald w
At 10:28 AM -0800 on 1/8/03, James A. Donald wrote:
> Men's fashions, however, change at the speed of glaciers, so
> there is little chance of that becoming acceptable for men.
All we need is the return of the fedora, I'd bet, as most cameras I can
remember are up high.
Cheers,
RAH
--
---
--
On 8 Jan 2003 at 16:54, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> In Japan, people are already wearing face masks frequently,
> ie. during the flu season. If such cultural shift happens
> here as well, we have partial protection against the
> face-recognition cams.
In today's Vietnam women commonly dress
> May be the worlds air getting polluted isn't so
> bad-atleast we could put anti-pollution masks and
> protect our identity :)
In Japan, people are already wearing face masks frequently, ie. during the
flu season. If such cultural sh9ft happens here as well, we have partial
protection against t
hi,
So where does that put privacy to.Your whole life
outside the house can be monitered-when there are many
cameras.
May be the worlds air getting polluted isn't so
bad-atleast we could put anti-pollution masks and
protect our identity :)
Regards Sarath.
--- Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
33 matches
Mail list logo
