On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:36:27PM -0700, Black Unicorn wrote:
> Oh great.
>
> Now every news story on this thing will be echoed by Mr. Choate directly to
> the list without any introductory commentary.
Yes. Don't feed the beast, or encourage him. That is not the path to
cypherpunk salvation.
-
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote:
> First, you will of course find that no one but yourself will check
> the "yahoogroups" ghetto site. (If you are not familiar with the
Possible, but at least I've got an archived list of cpunx-related
material, which I can reference later (with other newssour
>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Pointers to news sources and other mailing lists
> Eugene wrote:
>
> >Unless any of you people already run such a newsticker? No point in
> reinventing the wheel.
>
> The best security/crypto/privacy news ticker I've s
Eugene wrote:
>Unless any of you people already run such a newsticker? No point in
reinventing the wheel.
The best security/crypto/privacy news ticker I've seen is at
http://www.infosyssec.com, a portal which bills itself as "The most
comprehensive computer and network security resource on the
At 11:27 AM +0200 7/31/01, Eugene Leitl wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote:
>
>> I think most of the "pointers" are just symptoms of laziness. It
>> looks like people just think "cross-pollinating" without analysis is
>> the thing to do.
>
>Some of the pointers are also symptoms of a ba
At 11:00 AM -0700 7/31/01, Tim May wrote:
>
>Second, I'm confused. You say you have bad connectivity at work and
>no connection at home. If you can take Choate's URL pointers and
>follow them, why can you not go directly to the source (Yahoo,
>Slashdot, CNET, Wired, etc.)? And how will you acce
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote:
> I think most of the "pointers" are just symptoms of laziness. It
> looks like people just think "cross-pollinating" without analysis is
> the thing to do.
Some of the pointers are also symptoms of a bad connectivity. I've got
only a very lagged ssh link at *
Maybe we should form [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
- Original Message -
From: "Tim May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:28 AM
Subject: Pointers to news sources and other mailing lists
> I've noticed that about 90% of traffic to the