On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Bill Stewart wrote:
> Jim, the First Amendment is a fine thing, but it's got very little
> resemblence to twentieth-century US government practice :-)
Actually it does.
> Non-electronic speech and press gotten better treatment, mostly,
> since we've gotten away from the da
At 11:05 PM 9/14/01 -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote:
>Joe --
>
>I'm not calling in question their right to publish;
Then what is your point?
>BTW, if you look at the First Ammendment protections closer, they are
not
>guaranteeing absolute right of free speech. Learn the American law
before
>you inv
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> Personally, I have no problems with
> US State telling me I can't do business with terrorists. Do you?
Absolutely I do. I would have no problem with the USG placing
people/countries/whatever on lists that I could use as a reference to make
a *voluta
Vadim - I think in american we call it free speech. The content of the
message is not the issue - it is the right to publish it and one's
opinion which is the issue here guranteed by the U.S. constitution.
regards
joe
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Vadim Antonov wrote:
>
>
> Found on a website hosted
