At 01:19 PM 08/10/00 -0400, James A.. Donald wrote:
> --
>At 12:19 AM 08/10/00 -0400, James A.. Donald wrote:
> > > So are you claiming that this alleged evidence seemingly cited by
> > > Chomsky exists, or are you denying that Chomsky claimed the
> > > existence of this evidence?
>
>06
--
At 12:19 AM 08/10/00 -0400, James A.. Donald wrote:
> > So are you claiming that this alleged evidence seemingly cited by
> > Chomsky exists, or are you denying that Chomsky claimed the
> > existence of this evidence?
06:51 PM 10/7/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> Learn how to read - and co
At 12:19 AM 08/10/00 -0400, James A.. Donald wrote:
>Chomsky made some remarkable claims, which I have quoted, for the
>existence of some remarkable evidence.
>
>So are you claiming that this alleged evidence seemingly cited by Chomsky
>exists, or are you denying that Chomsky claimed the exi
--
At 09:55 PM 10/7/2000 -0400, Reese wrote:
> You are the entity making the allegations, yet Chomsky remains as
> accredited in some circles as he ever was.
Chomsky made some remarkable claims, which I have quoted, for the
existence of some remarkable evidence.
So are you claiming that t
--
At 08:36 PM 10/7/2000 -0700, James A.. Donald wrote:
Chomsky before 1979: (falsely purporting to be quoting "highly qualified
specialists")
: : executions have numbered at most in the thousands; that
: : these were localized in areas of limited Khmer Rouge
: : influence and u
--
At 10:59 AM 10/7/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> You've yet to make a coherent argument that will stand on its own
I have presented examples of Chomsky citing vaguely specified sources that
supposedly provide evidence for all sorts of astonishing things, supposedly
provide evidence for the
At 07:24 PM 07/10/00 -0400, James A.. Donald wrote:
>At 02:12 PM 10/7/2000 -0400, Tim May wrote:
> > As for Chomsky, I've been deleting all of the recent posts arguing
> > pro- or con-Chomsky.
>
>You did not miss much.
>
>In the most recent Chomsky thread, all the same things were said, as
At 1:42 PM -0400 10/7/00, Steve Furlong wrote:
>Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody;
>>
>> I have no interest in Chomsky flames and wish they would die.
>> In fact, I'm going to *MAKE* them die, for me at least, by
>> filtering posts on chomsky's name. (yes, this post right here
>> is go
Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
> Hi everybody;
>
> I have no interest in Chomsky flames and wish they would die.
> In fact, I'm going to *MAKE* them die, for me at least, by
> filtering posts on chomsky's name. (yes, this post right here
> is going into the bitbucket when it gets back to me from the
>
Hi everybody;
I have no interest in Chomsky flames and wish they would die.
In fact, I'm going to *MAKE* them die, for me at least, by
filtering posts on chomsky's name. (yes, this post right here
is going into the bitbucket when it gets back to me from the
list).
I'm just dropping this
--
At 07:56 PM 10/6/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> It
> dissects whines such as yours and sends them to the oven, where they can
> be properly roasted with flesh-searing heat, the better to reduce the
> fatty content.
I have often remarked on how Chomsky's board treats inconvenient facts and
--
At 03:39 PM 06/10/00 -1000, Reese wrote:
James A.. Donald wrote:
> > Distortions at Fourth Hand
> > Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman
> >The Nation, June 25, 1977
> >
> >: : such journals as the Far Eastern Economic Review , the
> >: : London Economist , the Melbourne
--
James A. Donald:
> > In his 1977 Nation article Chomsky claimed:
08:25 PM 10/5/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> *bt*
>
> 20 years or newer, remember? Within the last decade, or two? Remember?
So are you now admitting that Chomsky used to continually make fraudulent
citation
--
At 09:41 PM 10/5/2000 -0400, snit wrote:
> > > look, digslug, Justin Schwartz is an oxford-trained,
> > > yale-trained scholar, now a lawyer with the seventh circuit.
> > > he doesn't type things on a publicly accessible listserv where
> > > he can easily be quoted and humiliated for
--
James A. Donald:
> > Almost every Chomsky citation that I have checked was at best somewhat
misleading, and at worst a lie.
At 03:31 PM 10/5/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
> We've already seen how you picked up an extra word in that massacre quote,
> is it safe to assume you've made other e
--
James A. Donald:
> > It would take you [Justin Schwartz] years to check five hundred
> > Chomsky citations. His citations are at best obscure and hard to
> > find, at worst impossible to find.
At 09:41 PM 10/5/2000 -0400, snit wrote:
> look, digslug, Justin Schwartz is an oxford-trai
--
At 02:23 AM 10/3/2000 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
> But if Chomsky were in the habit of making up or "massaging" quotes,
> perhaps he wouldn't give full reference information even for real
> quotes. That way, when he did make up a quote, the lack of full cite
> wouldn't count as a dat
The quote it attributed to Clive Ponting's book on Churchill. So all
anyone has to do is check that.
Ponting is a reasonably well-known author it should be possible to find
the book and check page 132. Whether Ponting was telling the truth is
another matter - but he isn't Chomsky.
Nor is he a
--
Jim Choate wrote
> Anyway. I 'm not aware of any overt instances. I did some checking
> of resoruces when I read "Deterring Democracy". All of them (maybe a
> dozen) checked out and the quotes were reasonably represented.
Really?
Most Chomsky citations are extremely difficult to che
--
At 08:10 PM 01/10/00 -0700, James A.. Donald wrote:
>Chomsky is hardly a reliable source. He routinely fabricates or falsifies
>quotes. I suggest you check his alleged sources.
>
>Chances are you will be unable to find his alleged source. In the unlikely
>event that you are able
"James A.. Donald" wrote:
> If Churchill really said such a thing, we would have some source better
> than Chomsky for it, and if Churchill really did say it, Chomsky would have
> given us a source that was possible to verify.
But if Chomsky were in the habit of making up or "massaging" quotes,
p
--
At 07:49 AM 10/2/2000 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: If you're in a
hurry to actually back up your assertion, however, you're welcome to
do so sooner, if you would like. :-).
How can I prove Churchill did not say this? The problem is the curious
absence of evidence that he did say it.
Th
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Reese wrote:
>
> >
> > Are there any examples of this documented anywhere, preferably on the web?
> >
>
> I'm not aware of any overt instances. I
>
Ok, let's try that one again I think my machine is digitaly
hallucinating.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Reese wrote:
>
> Are there any examples of this documented anywhere, preferably on the web?
>
I'm not aware of any overt instances. I
24 matches
Mail list logo
