Re: Napster PI helpful

2000-07-28 Thread Tom Vogt
Eric Murray wrote: > I agree with you, Napster is going to try to switch their > user base to a for-pay model. it's not like this had not happened before - there was this swiss site that (non-commercially) provided lyrics to songs. they got sued by the record industry (I don't recall whether the

Re: Napster PI helpful

2000-07-27 Thread Craig Brozefsky
Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A very good analysis. > > And on a different tack, I expect/predict that Napster will reinvent > itself as a distributor of material with the permission of the record > companies and will then aggressively go after Gnutella, Freenet, and > Mojo types of s

Re: Napster PI helpful

2000-07-27 Thread Alex C. Snoeren
> And on a different tack, I expect/predict that Napster will reinvent > itself as a distributor of material with the permission of the record > companies and will then aggressively go after Gnutella, Freenet, and > Mojo types of sites. "Those who live by the sword..." They already have: http

Re: Napster PI helpful

2000-07-27 Thread Eric Murray
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 01:47:35PM -0400, Tim May wrote: > > Digression on "rent-seeking behavior." In an effort to stave off > corporate extinction, the loss of all of their IPO dreams, and the > laying-off of their employees, Napster will probably "cut a deal" > with the RIAA. They're alrea

Re: Napster PI helpful

2000-07-27 Thread Tim May
A very good analysis. And on a different tack, I expect/predict that Napster will reinvent itself as a distributor of material with the permission of the record companies and will then aggressively go after Gnutella, Freenet, and Mojo types of sites. "Those who live by the sword..." More com