--- Justin Guyett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-12-11T08:10:27-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
> > [snip]
> > This is what happens when one picks up ideas from people who present
> them
> > second-hand (or at even greater distances from their origin) and who
> do
> > not make proper footnotes.
--- "R.W. (Bob) Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Thompson wrote:
> > [take back the night]
>
> Yep, the state fights to preserve its "life"
> while the people suffer their own.
> The mistake of top down thinking
> lies in the inability to really model large populations with rules,
> t
--- Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-12-10T15:50:22-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
[snip]
> > state's personality, the state has the right, nay, obligation to
> preserve
> > its identity unchanged. (Isn't this pretty much polysci 101
> material?)
>
> Not typically. The idea that the st
On 2004-12-10T15:50:22-0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> --- "R.W. (Bob) Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Steve Thompson wrote:
> >
> > > --- "R.W. (Bob) Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [Colouring outside the lines]
> > >
> > Yes, you have a point there.I guess a better cover
Steve Thompson wrote:
c.f. "Take back the night", et. cetera. (And put it where?)
Anyhow, isn't insurrection illegal or something? ISTR reading about the
natural right of the corrupt state to exist unconditionally, and it's
obligation to crush any question of change for any reason.
The structure
--- "R.W. (Bob) Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> > --- "R.W. (Bob) Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Colouring outside the lines]
> >
> Yes, you have a point there.I guess a better cover would be as local
> coordinator of Neighborhood Watch
c.f. "Take b
