On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 06:20:13PM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> A verbal agreement between two parties that dictate how they will relate
> to each other is a contract.
Could you provide some cites to the U.S. Constitution, the
Bill of Rights, and some recent articles on Slashdot to back up that poi
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:00:34PM -0700, Eric Murray wrote:
> Posts that are received (enter the CDR system) at lne and are forwarded
> to the other CDRs are demimed.
>
> Posts originating from another CDR are demimed on the way
> to lne CDR subscribers.
>
> Posts originating from another CDR a
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> Unless it fails to contain all the elements required of a valid contract
> (you know those elements, don't you Jimbo?)
1. Capacity of the parties.
2. Mutual agreement (assent) or meeting of the minds (a valid offer and
acceptance)
3. Consideratio
Jimbo I wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>
> > Unless it fails to contain all the elements required of a valid contract
> > (you know those elements, don't you Jimbo?)
>
> 1. Capacity of the parties.
>
> 2. Mutual agreement (assent) or meeting of the minds (a valid offer and
>
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Eric Murray wrote:
> There's no CDR contract. At least I didn't sign one.
You don't have to sign it. You only have to agree to it verbally, or in
this case email.
A verbal agreement between two parties that dictate how they will relate
to each other is a contract.
If you d
Malpractice Stooge wrote:
> A verbal agreement between two
> parties that dictate how they
> will relate to each other is a
> contract.
Unless it fails to contain all the elements required of a valid contract
(you know those elements, don't you Jimbo?) or it violates the Statute of
Frauds or sim
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:00:34PM -0700, Eric Murray wrote:
>
> I've also found the source of the wrapped Message-Ids and I'll
> be fixing it soon.
>
>
> Eric
>
That's good news. The duplicated messages were confusing.
-Bill
