Re: DC Security Geeks Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System

2003-09-27 Thread Tim May
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 06:42 AM, Ed Reed wrote: Grisham might be better - it's the legal wrangling that would tie up people's imagination, more than the technical. "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/25/2003 12:46:13 PM >>> At 02:48 PM 9/24/03 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:

Re: DC Security Geeks Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System

2003-09-27 Thread Ed Reed
Grisham might be better - it's the legal wrangling that would tie up people's imagination, more than the technical. >>> "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/25/2003 12:46:13 PM >>> At 02:48 PM 9/24/03 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: >

Re: DC Security Geeks Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System

2003-09-25 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:48 PM 9/24/03 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > > >Cryptonomicon.Net - > >Talk: Analysis of an Electronic Voting System Someone needs to inject a story about e-voting fraud into the popular imagination. Is Tom Clancy availa