Re: Condit's false testimony to cops

2001-07-10 Thread George
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # #I'm sure the locals aren't looking forward to pissing off one #of their potential "agents of funding" on something as #inconsequential as a simple bimbo killing... Yes, that's a factoid not to be dismissed. Today on the news it was clearly stated that

Re: Condit's false testimony to cops

2001-07-10 Thread Tim May
At 9:12 PM -0500 7/9/01, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote: > >> > Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special >> > objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet? >> >> Right. It was former AG Thornburgh who noted on

Re: Condit's false testimony to cops

2001-07-10 Thread Tim May
At 10:04 PM -0400 7/9/01, Declan McCullagh wrote: >On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special >> objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet? > >Right. It was former AG Thornburgh

Re: Condit's false testimony to cops

2001-07-09 Thread Declan McCullagh
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:37:02PM -0700, Tim May wrote: > It depends on the specific phrasings used. And whether he was under > oath (for a "perjury" charge). If the FBI was present, a so-called > "1001" violation could have occurred, though it is difficult to prove > such lies. Then again, t

Re: Condit's false testimony to cops

2001-07-09 Thread measl
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote: > > Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special > > objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet? > > Right. It was former AG Thornburgh who noted on a talk show yesterday > that the cops still hadn't searched

Re: Condit's false testimony to cops

2001-07-09 Thread Declan McCullagh
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Congresscritters and other political vermin are most assuredly "special > objects". Is there *anyone* who has not realized this yet? Right. It was former AG Thornburgh who noted on a talk show yesterday that the cops still h

Re: Condit's false testimony to cops

2001-07-09 Thread Tim May
At 4:22 PM -0700 7/9/01, Dynamite Bob wrote: >Its illegal to lie to cops (though not to be mute to them). > It depends on the specific phrasings used. And whether he was under oath (for a "perjury" charge). If the FBI was present, a so-called "1001" violation could have occurred, though it is d