Re: Anonymizer employees need killing

2004-03-28 Thread R. A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 1:53 PM -0600 3/28/04, bgt wrote: >What I'm blaming Lance for is snake-oil marketing. Don't be a putz. He's marketing it for what it is. Lance has never made any claims of perfect anonymity. >> And, finally, one last thing. After 5 or 6 years of i

Re: Anonymizer employees need killing

2004-03-28 Thread bgt
On Mar 28, 2004, at 9:05, R. A. Hettinga wrote: Anonymizer is set up to prevent *businesses*, stalkers, and small-time crooks like spammers, from seeing your behavior on the net and annoying you there. What's he going to do when uncle Fed shows up with guns? Have a shootout or something? This is e

Re: Anonymizer employees need killing

2004-03-28 Thread R. A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 1:01 AM -0600 3/28/04, bgt wrote: >you state openly in your policy that you're not to be >trusted! Think about it for a second. Anonymizer is set up to prevent *businesses*, stalkers, and small-time crooks like spammers, from seeing your behavior

Re: Anonymizer employees need killing

2004-03-27 Thread bgt
On Mar 27, 2004, at 23:13, Lance Cottrell wrote: I hope at this point the retractions by the Register have been well circulated. Just to make it absolutely clear, we have never and never will sell out a customer. This is simply shoddy reporting at its worst. I would have hoped that my years of

Re: Anonymizer employees need killing

2004-03-27 Thread Lance Cottrell
I hope at this point the retractions by the Register have been well circulated. Just to make it absolutely clear, we have never and never will sell out a customer. This is simply shoddy reporting at its worst. A blog first reported this months ago as "an anonymizer" which was then picked up

Re: Anonymizer employees need killing

2004-03-26 Thread Eric Tully
From The Register: "To download the online picture, he used the anonymising Surfola service (and not Anonymiser.com as we mistakenly wrote in our initial report - apologies to all concerned - Ed), believing the company’s privacy policy would protect him." So now I don't know what to believ

Re: Anonymizer employees need killing

2004-03-26 Thread petard
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:32:43AM -0500, An Metet wrote: > >From http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/36485.html : > > "To download the online picture, he used the Anonymizer.com service, > believing the companys privacy policy would protect him. Not so. Dutch The article got it wrong. He u