On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> > ...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
> > some component which made them slightly ill.
>
> Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them pretty
> sick...
Gee golly! I'm so glad that CNN told me that the
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 09:18 AM, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
some component which made them slightly ill.
Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them
pretty
sick...
First, if they are eating shuttle
> ...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
> some component which made them slightly ill.
Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them pretty
sick...
Sigh, for the nth time already: While it's likely that bare boards,
replacement and replaced parts, manuals, access codes to tell the satelite
it's being worked on, etc... would burn up, pieces that were shielded
would survive. Think!
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos
Title: CDR: Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"
I'd check anything with a Geiger counter before touching it.
The shuttle may have been using radioactive decay for power
(http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/fact_sheets/future.html)
or may
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote:
> Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
> been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
> repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
>
> Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:07 PM, John Kelsey wrote:
A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA
wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There
are no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these
pieces. And they certainly did
At 10:19 AM 2/2/03 -0800, Tim May wrote:
...
Speaking of journalists, why does Wolf Blitzer repeat this obvious lie
about the metal bits and pieces being tainted by evil spirits? Because
these so-called journalists are stooges for the state.
Well, the bit about "18 times the speed of light," an
Think upgrading of circuit boards. Remove old board, insert new board for
example. Leaving the old board circling around may not be a good
thing. Just for example.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear
--- Eric Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb
> I'm not sure which is more irritating-- the obvious
> way in which
> the govermedia manipulate the issue, or their
> automatic assumption that
> americans are too stupid/criminal to turn in all the
> parts they
> find if NASA just said "w
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Dave Howe wrote:
Sunder wrote:
Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.
Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but th
At 10:19 AM -0800 2/2/03, Tim May wrote:
>Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at
>the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18
>times faster than the speed of light."
>
>Yes, "speed of light."
"Please mister spaceman, won't you please take me a
Tim May wrote...
"Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at the
bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18 times faster
than the speed of light."
Yes, "speed of light." "
Yo Choate! Want to take a crack at this? Please explain using your theories
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 10:19 AM, Tim May wrote:
Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at
the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18
times faster than the speed of light."
Yes, "speed of light."
This same slug has since appeared
14 matches
Mail list logo
