On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote:
> Large corporations like nothing more than having a powerful central
> government freeze the status quo.
> And big companies love it when little competitors are frozen out.
> The DCMA is just another way to freeze out innovation. Those who try
So much f
At 10:37 PM -0400 7/21/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 06:46:27PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
>> Had the DCMA been in effect in the 1950s, the Xerox Corporation and
>> its execs and engineers probably would have faced charges for
>> producing a "circumvention device" for enabling
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 06:46:27PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
> Had the DCMA been in effect in the 1950s, the Xerox Corporation and
> its execs and engineers probably would have faced charges for
> producing a "circumvention device" for enabling copyright violators.
> What, really, is the difference
At 06:46 PM 7/21/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>Had the DCMA been in effect in the 1950s, the Xerox Corporation and
>its execs and engineers probably would have faced charges for
>producing a "circumvention device" for enabling copyright violators.
>What, really, is the difference between a Xerox ma
