Just herd of this http://www.spammimic.com/
AW
Alan wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 23:21 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
If you really want to send secret messages, just send it in the chaff in
spam. Everyone is programmed to ignore it or filter it out.
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Alan wrote:
> If you really want to send secret messages, just send it in the chaff in
> spam. Everyone is programmed to ignore it or filter it out.
Yeah, but it doesn't make for great story copy or funding proposals ;-)
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95
hi,
Tyler Durden wrote:
>Are there certain images that can hide stego more
>effectively? IN other words,
>these images should have a lot of spectral energy in
>the same frequency bands where Stego would normally
>show.
Yes, there should be a lot of noise in the image, some
way or the other. If
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:21:31PM -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
> At 02:07 PM 2/1/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
>
> >Counter-stego detection.
> >
> >Seems to me a main tool will be a 2-D Fourier analysis...Stego will
> >certainly have a certain "thumbprint", depending on the algorithm. Are
Stego does
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 23:21 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
> At 02:07 PM 2/1/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
>
> >Counter-stego detection.
> >
> >Seems to me a main tool will be a 2-D Fourier analysis...Stego will
> >certainly have a certain "thumbprint", depending on the algorithm. Are
> >there certain i
At 02:07 PM 2/1/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
Counter-stego detection.
Seems to me a main tool will be a 2-D Fourier analysis...Stego will
certainly have a certain "thumbprint", depending on the algorithm. Are
there certain images that can hide stego more effectively? IN other words,
these images sh
Counter-stego detection.
Seems to me a main tool will be a 2-D Fourier analysis...Stego will
certainly have a certain "thumbprint", depending on the algorithm. Are there
certain images that can hide stego more effectively? IN other words, these
images should have a lot of spectral energy in the
