RE: Zombie Patriots and other musings [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-11 Thread Trei, Peter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nothing less than a guerilla war seems necessary to restore > something akin to the original constitutional balance in the > U.S. But where to recruit these people? My suggestion: the > terminally ill. > Many TI come to the table with a 'gift', the certaint

Re: Zombie Patriots and other musings [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-11 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 03:04 AM 12/11/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Nothing less than a guerilla war seems necessary to restore something akin to the original constitutional balance in the U.S. But where to recruit these people? My suggestion: the terminally ill. > >Many TI come to the table with a 'gift', the

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-11 Thread cubic-dog
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, J.A. Terranson wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Anatoly Vorobey wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:47:27AM +0100, edo wrote: > > > With the USA > > > becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise... > > > > That's a pretty silly thing to say. > > Sure you don't

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-11 Thread Pete Capelli
- Original Message - From: "Anatoly Vorobey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: Re: (No Subject) > No, it's silly because he said "becoming". Had he said "is", it would've > b

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-11 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:10:03PM -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote: > > > With the USA > > > becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise... > > > > That's a pretty silly thing to say. > > Sure you don't want to educate yourself on those other states in the > > world? > > It's not silly

Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-10 Thread Freematt357
In a message dated 12/10/2003 10:34:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I receive several messages a month saying I need to re-verify > information with an E-gold account (which I never recall establishing, > by the way). > > If I ever determine that E-Gold personnel have

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-10 Thread Michael Kalus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10-Dec-03, at 11:10 PM, J.A. Terranson wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Anatoly Vorobey wrote: > > Just a few hundred dead federal goons, spread over a relatively short > period > (~6 months), where the attacks were obviously coordinated, made against

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-10 Thread J.A. Terranson
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Anatoly Vorobey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:47:27AM +0100, edo wrote: > > With the USA > > becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise... > > That's a pretty silly thing to say. > Sure you don't want to educate yourself on those other states in the > worl

Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-10 Thread Tim May
On Dec 10, 2003, at 6:20 PM, Bill Stewart wrote: On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in > checking account holder identification Unfortunately, they also don't due much if any due diligence in identifying themselves in messa

Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-10 Thread Nostradumbass
Original Message From: Bill Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in > > checking account holder identification > > Unfortunately, they also don't due much if any due diligen

Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-10 Thread Bill Stewart
On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in > checking account holder identification Unfortunately, they also don't due much if any due diligence in identifying themselves in messages to real or potential customers, so it's extrem

Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-10 Thread Nostradumbass
Original Message From: "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Apparently from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)] Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:13:59 -0800 > -- > On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PR

Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-10 Thread James A. Donald
-- On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in > checking account holder identification, so if you use an > effective proxying means (e.g., an open Wi-Fi hotspot) to > create and access your accounts you are pretty safe. If y

ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]

2003-12-10 Thread Nostradumbass
At 10:37 AM 12/10/2003, James A. Donald wrote: -- On 9 Dec 2003 at 0:47, edo wrote: >> What I'm curious about is digital currencies. Can anyone >> speak about the Digital Monetary Trust or DMT? I'm sorry I >> have not read the last upteen years of mail archives, but I'm >> interested in what pe

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-10 Thread James A. Donald
-- On 9 Dec 2003 at 0:47, edo wrote: > What I'm curious about is digital currencies. Can anyone > speak about the Digital Monetary Trust or DMT? I'm sorry I > have not read the last upteen years of mail archives, but I'm > interested in what people think NOW about Orlin Grabbe, DMT, > e-gold et

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-10 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:20:20PM -0600, Declan McCullagh wrote: > We have anonymity in Web browsing (more or less, thanks to Lance & > co). It's not NSA-proof, but it's probably subpoena-proof. > > We have anonymity in email thanks to remailers (to the extent they're > still around). > > We hav

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-09 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:47:27AM +0100, edo wrote: > With the USA > becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise... That's a pretty silly thing to say. Sure you don't want to educate yourself on those other states in the world? > As far as I'm concerned, true anonymity in finacial

Re: No Subject

2001-09-16 Thread Declan McCullagh
At 10:35 AM 9/15/01 -0700, citizenQ wrote: >You missed the irony, I guess I should have put in the irony-smiley. > >Given the overall context of the bill, the debate on the floor, and it's >conclusion your report is shrill and Chicken-littleish, which does nothing >for creating credible support

RE: No Subject

2001-09-14 Thread Aimee Farr
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of citizenQ > Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: No Subject > > > Reading the discussion I see that the amendment calls for > inclusion of 'terrorist activies' into

Re: (no subject)

2000-08-31 Thread Steven Furlong
Tim May wrote: > > At 1:32 PM -0400 8/31/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >you know any child porn sider i beg you please send me some! > > I see the cops in Smalltown, U.S.A. have returned from their > Conference on Law Enforcement Advanced Tactics and are practicing > their newfound skills in lo