Petro wrote:
> When you say "broken soley through brute force" do you have
> some kind of time limit in mind? Because if you don't, they *all*
> (except one time pads) can be broken *in time* through brute force.
> It's just that with sufficiently high key sizes, that *in time* goes
> past
>> >Based on Moore's Law, this means it will be secure on computers roughly
>> >10,000 times more powerful than today's systems. How likely is that?
>
>>Its not hard to imagine, if all we're talking about is brute force attacks.
>
>Those are essentially the numbers I came up with as well. Howeve
At 07:55 PM 4/4/00 -0400, Thomas J. Kluegel wrote:
>>Based on Moore's Law, this means it will be secure on computers roughly
>>10,000 times more powerful than today's systems. How likely is that?
>
>Its not hard to imagine, if all we're talking about is brute force attacks.
Network costs decreas
