--
On 15 Mar 2002, at 15:13, Trei, Peter wrote:
> mattd has actually improved slightly as well - some of his
> messages are actually on-topic, and reference other's
> postings appropriately.
This inspired me to glance through my shit folder, into which
I filter spam, the deranged, etc. Yes.
At 05:28 PM 3/15/02 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>rest of drug-addled gibberish elided
>
>Hey, with all of the folks offering "reformatted" repostings of
rehashed
>repeats of old news here, can't anybody offer to translate this
>architect/nutcase guy's posts from his internal crackpipe lingo into
>so
No you drop me a line you may be the bastarded who killed my wife
and kids.
On 15 Mar 2002 at 14:43, j eric townsend wrote:
> At 09:29 -0800 2002/03/15, Tim May wrote:
> >Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was
> >getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 mes
J. Eric wrote:
>Here's an idea -- why not use whatever you use to filter things into
>your cypherpunks mailbox to first filter out anything from people you
>don't want to read instead of whining to everyone on the list about
>how much they send that you don't want to read?
This appears sound
On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 08:14 PM, John Young wrote:
> J. Eric wrote:
>
>> Here's an idea -- why not use whatever you use to filter things into
>> your cypherpunks mailbox to first filter out anything from people you
>> don't want to read instead of whining to everyone on the list about
>>
On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 02:43 PM, j eric townsend wrote:
> At 09:29 -0800 2002/03/15, Tim May wrote:
>> Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was
>> getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 messages in my
>> "Cypherpunks" filtered mailbox. So I looked at
At 09:29 -0800 2002/03/15, Tim May wrote:
>Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was
>getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 messages in my
>"Cypherpunks" filtered mailbox. So I looked at what the cat drug in:
Here's an idea -- why not use whatever you use to
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
> mattd has actually improved slightly as well - some of his messages
> are actually on-topic, and reference other's postings appropriately.
> It's been a full week since he's called for my violent death.
An entire *week*? Naw. Not possible...
If no
> Tim May[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
>
> Being away from the Net for nearly 24 hours, I wondered why I was
> getting 90 e-mails downloading, but only about 16 messages in my
> "Cypherpunks" filtered mailbox. So I looked at what the cat drug in:
>
> -- 29 messages from Choate, the usual
