RE: Freedom of speech is for "Cypherpunk critics" too

2001-09-15 Thread Sandy Sandfort
"Nomen Nescio" wrote: > Tim May writes: > > Funny, I notice how many of the critics of Cypherpunks and > supporters of > > this express train approach to repealing the Bill of Rights are > > themselves hiding behind Cypherpunks remailers, Hushmail aliases, and > > Ziplip nyms. > > If you're

Re: Freedom of speech is for "Cypherpunk critics" too

2001-09-15 Thread Jim Choate
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Tim May wrote: > No, I'm not "upset." I said it was "funny," as in "ironic." Bull, your implication was they were hypocrites and cowards. Don't white wash it. > The main critics of anonymity are the main users here. > > Hilarious. Actually it isn't. It's a perfect exampl

Re: Freedom of speech is for "Cypherpunk critics" too

2001-09-15 Thread Tim May
On Saturday, September 15, 2001, at 12:40 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote: > Tim May writes: >> Funny, I notice how many of the critics of Cypherpunks and supporters >> of >> this express train approach to repealing the Bill of Rights are >> themselves hiding behind Cypherpunks remailers, Hushmail aliase

Re: Freedom of speech is for "Cypherpunk critics" too

2001-09-15 Thread Meyer Wolfsheim
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Nomen Nescio wrote: > If you're upset that "critics of the Cypherpunks" are able to speak > freely then you shouldn't have supported the technologies that enable > them to do so. Free speech is for everyone, not just those who toe your > line of violence and blood revenge.

RE: Freedom of speech is for "Cypherpunk critics" too

2001-09-15 Thread Jim Choate
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote: > "Nomen Nescio" wrote: > > > Tim May writes: > > > Funny, I notice how many of the critics of Cypherpunks and > > supporters of > > > this express train approach to repealing the Bill of Rights are > > > themselves hiding behind Cypherpunks remaile