On Friday 25 July 2003 11:40, Steve Schear wrote:
> ... Now that many are un-
> or under-employed there still doesn't seem to be any activity by
> those active on this list in this critical infrastructure area.
In some sense, we have enough code. Code exists that can be deployed. It
may have to
On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 02:36 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:40, Steve Schear wrote:
... Now that many are un-
or under-employed there still doesn't seem to be any activity by
those active on this list in this critical infrastructure area.
Speaking only for myself, I'm ma
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:40, Steve Schear wrote:
> ... Now that many are un-
> or under-employed there still doesn't seem to be any activity by
> those active on this list in this critical infrastructure area.
Speaking only for myself, I'm making a lot less than I was a couple of
years ago. In
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, John Young wrote:
> The old days, don't believe them, cypherpunks was and is toxic
> to serious makeovers and shutdowns and lock-outs, and, never
> forget that PLONKS are cries of shut the fuck up and listen to me.
> Pluck the PLONKS, if you don't get them you aint earning you
Oh, like Uday and Qusay, you can't kill this immortal fucker,
nobody got the guts to plow a TOW in it. Instead, thousands of
gutless have hari-kiried by exiting the battle for well.com
nutlick where the dead live in perfect, silent synchrony, so that
is a no-brain, no-work option. Sit still, chi
