Steve Furlong wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:50, Dave Howe wrote:
The "regular encryption scheme" (last I looked at a QKE product) was XOR
Well, if it's good enough for Microsoft, it's good enough for everyone.
I have it on good authority that Microsoft's designers and programmers
are second t
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 06:27, Dave Howe wrote:
> I have yet to see an advantage to QKE that even mildly justifies the
> limitations and cost over anything more than a trivial link (two
> buildings within easy walking distance, sending high volumes of
> extremely sensitive material between them)
But
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:50, Dave Howe wrote:
> The "regular encryption scheme" (last I looked at a QKE product) was XOR
Well, if it's good enough for Microsoft, it's good enough for everyone.
I have it on good authority that Microsoft's designers and programmers
are second to none. (Microsoft
Tyler Durden wrote:
Oops. You're right. It's been a while. Both photons are not utilized,
but there's a Private channel and a public channel. As for MITM attacks,
however, it seems I was right more or less by accident, and the
collapsed ring configuration seen in many tightly packed metro areas
e of any
mergers/acquisition deals.
-TD
From: Dave Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Quantum cryptography gets "practical"
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:26:32 +0100
Tyler Durden wrote:
An interesting thing to think about is the fact that
Dave Howe wrote:
I think this is part of the
purpose behind the following paper:
http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/229.pdf
which I am currently trying to understand and failing miserably at *sigh*
Nope, finally strugged to the end to find a section pointing out that it
does *not* prevent mitm attacks.
r anything more than a trivial link (two
buildings within easy walking distance, sending high volumes of
extremely sensitive material between them)
-TD
From: Dave Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Email List: Cryptography <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Email List: Cypherpunks <[EMAIL
hard time finding a place it can be deployed and still retain its
"advantages".
-TD
From: Dave Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Email List: Cryptography <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Email
List: Cypherpunks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: QC Hype Watch: Quantum cryptography gets prac
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Two factors have made this possible: the
vast stretches of optical fiber (lit and dark) laid in metropolitan areas,
which very conveniently was laid from one of your customers to another
of your customers (not between telcos?) - or are they talking only
having to lay new lin
CTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: QC Hype Watch: Quantum cryptography gets practical
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:59:40 -0700
At 05:12 PM 9/30/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
What's a "quantum repeater" in this context?
It's also known as a "wiretap inserti
At 05:12 PM 9/30/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
What's a "quantum repeater" in this context?
It's also known as a "wiretap insertion point"...
> As for "Hype Watch", I tend to agree, but I also believe that Gelfond
> (who I spoke to last year) actually does have a 'viable' system.
> Commerically viable
Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QC Hype Watch: Quantum cryptography gets practical
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:39:24 -0400
<http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,96111,00.html>
- Computerworld
Quantum cryptography gets
<http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,96111,00.html>
- Computerworld
Quantum cryptography gets practical
Opinion by Bob Gelfond, MagiQ Technologies Inc.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 (COMPUTERWORLD) - In theory and in labs, quantum
cryptography -- cryptography based
13 matches
Mail list logo
