Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-28 Thread Bill Stewart
Ray - it looks like Disappearing Inc. has been disappearing.com for about 1.5 years longer than you've been disappearing-inc.com. In October 99, Maclen Marvit, the CEO of Disappearing, Inc. spoke at the Cypherpunks meeting in San Francisco, shortly after they had a front-page article in USA Today

Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-25 Thread Ray Dillinger
Well, after a short conversation with the USPTO's server, I now have an application on file for a trademark which I can use to defend my business' web address. Unfortunately, after a short discussion with the California Corporation Commission, it appears that I cannot now incorporate under t

Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-25 Thread Ray Dillinger
Correction: After a web search through USPTO, I find that there is another company also named Disappearing Inc, on Howard street in San Francisco. This is probably the company that was referred to. To clarify: I have done business as "disappearing inc", and I am the owner of the domain

Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-25 Thread Ray Dillinger
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >AbsoluteFuture.com of Bellvue, Wash., has dubbed its service "SafeMessage," >describing it as a "direct messaging" service that transmits messages from party to >party without the use of a central server. > >This distinction is significant becaus

Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-25 Thread Ray Dillinger
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Rival products include HushMail, ZixMail, Disappearing Inc. and Authentica. > I own Disappaering Inc. We have no such product and we have no such product under development. Ray Dillinger

Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-25 Thread Harmon Seaver
Ken Brown wrote: > So you avoid using an email server by... > > > To use SafeMessage, a person signs on to the program with an ID > > and password, similarly to an >email client. When typing the > > recipient, the person sends the contact to AbsoluteFuture's > > server, which locates the recipi

Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-25 Thread D.Popkin
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:31:12AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > By Cecily Barnes > Staff Writer, CNET News.com > September 22, 2000, 12:20 p.m. PT > URL: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2841067.html <> > The encryption not only prevents outsiders from reading the m

Re: New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-24 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:31:12AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > By Cecily Barnes > Staff Writer, CNET News.com > September 22, 2000, 12:20 p.m. PT > URL: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2841067.html <> > The encryption not only prevents outsiders from reading the message, but > also li

New email could confound law enforcement

2000-09-23 Thread anonymous
By Cecily Barnes Staff Writer, CNET News.com September 22, 2000, 12:20 p.m. PT URL: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-2841067.html A start-up is set to release a novel messaging service that lets people send heavily encrypted email directly to each other, a development that could be a boon f