David Honig wrote:
> >it would have considerable starting problems. not many people are so
> >sold on their favorite band that they'd buy a whole new home music
> >system to listen to their latest album.
>
> True, but the huge content + channel entities 0wn very large percentages
> of the pop co
At 01:28 AM 7/5/00 -0400, Secret Squirrel wrote:
>That is, unless analog recording equipment is criminalized and
>exterminated (illegal possession of a microphone - 5 years. Possession
>of a microphone while committing a copyright crime - 10 years.)
All future analog recording gear sold in U$ mus
Tom Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> which is why some companies (intel, among others) work on systems to
> have the whole channel, from source (CD or file) to speakers encrypted.
> yes, that requires special hardware. I guess the hard part will be
> convincing customers to buy new hardware so
On Cypherpunks, Joseph Ashwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't believe someone is stupid enough to believe that this
> might actually even slow someone down. just grab the output of the
> program (aka the input to the sound card), and pipe it into a wav
> file. Gee, that put's us exa
At 06:25 AM 7/4/00 -0400, Tom Vogt wrote:
>David Honig wrote:
>> >I guess the hard part will be
>> >convincing customers to buy new hardware so they can do less with it.
>>
>> Or simply release only in those media. The benefits of owning/conspiring
>> with the distribution channels.
>it would h
jeradonah wrote:
> New Encryption System Would
> Protect Digital Music
interesting concept, but won't work. as long as there is an unencrypted
datastream somewhere, said datastream can be copied. and once it's
copied, it'll be available as an unencrypted .mp3 or whatever the for
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/07/biztech/articles/03pate.html
July 3, 2000
PATENTS
New Encryption System Would
Protect Digital Music
By SABRA CHARTRAND
As the Internet continues to influence the evolution of intellectual property law and
policy
