* Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020301]:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Tim May wrote:
>
> > In a free society a person may sell to whom he wishes, or not sell, as
> > he wishes.
>
> Dell Corporation is NOT a person. Corporations do NOT have rights and such
> activity as you support is nothing more t
On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 11:16 PM, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
>Thanks very much, [Dell PR person]
>To Our Valued Customers and Friends:
>
>U.S. export laws restrict the sale of technology to terrorists and to
>people in countries that support terrorism. These laws alsoWh
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 08:01 AM, John Young wrote:
> Michael Dell's statement is a more grievous attack
> on civil liberties than the original it tries to apologize
> for.
>
> It is inappropriate for a company to engage in the
> range of considerations for domestic, non-export
> use
>>What to brace for are more incidents which will justify a united front
of government and corporate assault on civil liberties...<<
These may be manufactured quite easily,agent provocateurs have a long
hirstory in anarchism.Oddly the more the MILIND strive for security the
faster it slips th
Michael Dell's statement is a more grievous attack
on civil liberties than the original it tries to apologize
for.
It is inappropriate for a company to engage in the
range of considerations for domestic, non-export
use of a product Dell outlines unless the company
has made those considerations p
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 01:55:38 -0500
From: Seth Finkelstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthew Gaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Brian McWilliams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Michael Dell's statement about suspicious orders
Thanks for the opportunity to respond to the
