On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
> > Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
> > which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
> > curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in "the real world". (Tim May,
>
>Thanks. It's nice to run int
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
> As a (fellow) trained physicst, do you actually believe that
> quantum-encrypted signals are truly secure as a byproduct of basic
> physical law, or do even YOU believe that QM is merely a "useful
> calculational tool",
No 'label' is ever the thing it label
On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 11:33 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in "the real
Or even piqued.
world".
Weirder st
